• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: More EU nonsense

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "More EU nonsense"

Collapse

  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    From the Spectator? I'm shocked, SHOCKED!
    They're starting to join the Breitbart, Zerohedge and other right wing press in their useless journalistic crusade to prove who is the crappiest...

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post
    Seems to be some selective journalism going on here, from the actual press release:
    From the Spectator? I'm shocked, SHOCKED!

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Seems to be some selective journalism going on here, from the actual press release:

    The new 2014 directive on tobacco products seeks, first, to facilitate the smooth functioning of the internal market for tobacco and related products, taking as a base a high level of protection of human health and, secondly, to meet the obligations of the European Union under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

    That directive provides in particular for the prohibition from 20 May 2020 of the placing on the market of tobacco products with a characterising flavour and for the standardisation of the labelling and packaging of tobacco products. In addition, it introduces special rules for electronic cigarettes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    What are all these people talking about, and what business is it of theirs?

    Manufacturers should be free to sell whatever packet sizes with whatever designs they want, without politicians and bureaucrats bossing them around.
    And is that the same for all dangerous drugs?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    So on pack size, what would your considered view be on Wakefield MA, Morley C, Horan JK and Cummings KM, (2002), The Cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 11(suppl.1):i73−i80?
    What are all these people talking about, and what business is it of theirs?

    Manufacturers should be free to sell whatever packet sizes with whatever designs they want, without politicians and bureaucrats bossing them around.

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    So on pack size, what would your considered view be on Wakefield MA, Morley C, Horan JK and Cummings KM, (2002), The Cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 11(suppl.1):i73−i80?
    Limited interest - instead of trying to harmonise things just put the details on the fookin packet and let me as an adult make a decision.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    So on pack size, what would your considered view be on Wakefield MA, Morley C, Horan JK and Cummings KM, (2002), The Cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 11(suppl.1):i73−i80?
    It's about 8 minutes to four

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Just to confirm my view that if you give people power they will exploit it.

    https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-e...and-pointless/

    This is not harmonisation and nor is it evidence-based policy-making. It is Brussels throwing its weight around with a botched compromise of a directive that will achieve nothing. There is no good reason why British shops should not be able to sell cigarettes in packs of ten or e-cigarette fluid in 20-millilitre bottles. Why can’t they just leave us alone?
    So on pack size, what would your considered view be on Wakefield MA, Morley C, Horan JK and Cummings KM, (2002), The Cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control. 11(suppl.1):i73−i80?

    Leave a comment:


  • original PM
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Just to confirm my view that if you give people power they will exploit it.

    https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-e...and-pointless/

    This is not harmonisation and nor is it evidence-based policy-making. It is Brussels throwing its weight around with a botched compromise of a directive that will achieve nothing. There is no good reason why British shops should not be able to sell cigarettes in packs of ten or e-cigarette fluid in 20-millilitre bottles. Why can’t they just leave us alone?
    Because they are not interested in you or your civil liberties they are interested in getting the UK to continue to pay them lots of money so they can continue to debate tulip like this.

    It is one of the reasons I am out - it is just pointless to spend money on something you do not want.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Just to confirm my view that if you give people power they will exploit it.

    https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-e...and-pointless/

    This is not harmonisation and nor is it evidence-based policy-making. It is Brussels throwing its weight around with a botched compromise of a directive that will achieve nothing. There is no good reason why British shops should not be able to sell cigarettes in packs of ten or e-cigarette fluid in 20-millilitre bottles. Why can’t they just leave us alone?
    Of course there's a reason - Every vape bottle sold means less tobacco tax revenue!

    What a bunch of brazen hypocrites, insisting on large scary warnings and gruesome pictures on cigarette packets, and taxing smokers, while at the same time trying to limit practical alternatives to smoking!

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    started a topic More EU nonsense

    More EU nonsense

    Just to confirm my view that if you give people power they will exploit it.

    https://health.spectator.co.uk/the-e...and-pointless/

    This is not harmonisation and nor is it evidence-based policy-making. It is Brussels throwing its weight around with a botched compromise of a directive that will achieve nothing. There is no good reason why British shops should not be able to sell cigarettes in packs of ten or e-cigarette fluid in 20-millilitre bottles. Why can’t they just leave us alone?

Working...
X