Originally posted by SueEllen
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Sir Philip Green must repay £400m or lose knighthood, says MP"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostIt's a good character thingy innit? Just how did he get KBE with money channeled to his wife's in Monaco, it was legal, but that sort of thing should have precluded him from getting anything other than tax investigation.
The reality is it is bought. Like DA being poster of the year! WTAF!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Scruff View PostHis morality is being questioned, in order to make a valid claim for his KBE? The moral maze is never straightforward... 🎖
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostSo 90% of people on this site who take divis from their profitable companies need quotes around the "legal"?
The question is whether the pension payments were up to date. And they look like they were.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostEvidence for what?
I've got the flaming torch ready to light.
After all, everything he & the next bunch did was "legal".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostOf course he didn't. Fine, upstanding chap that he is.
The UK has to encourage job creators and those who work hard. The feckless(typified by bankers) are another story.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostOf course he didn't. Fine, upstanding chap that he is.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostPlanned obsolescence.
They want you to buy a new suit every year or so. Like with shoes that aren't suppose to last more than 3 months and boots that are only suppose to last one season.
11 - 21 bought for weddings light weigh and won't stand up to more than once a month use. - Top shop and Burtons were good at this in their day.
20 - 30 Gets abused and worn in an office - Marks and Spencer were very good at this.
30 + thats what a tailor is there for.
All three segments fit the buy one or two suits a year model. However if you are selling crap in the 11-21 segment while trying to charge 30+ money you are going to come unstuck and £5-600 will get you a bespoke suite if you know where to look. I have at least one of mine that is 10 years old and still looks new it hasn't stopped me buying more suits its just that it lasts properly.
BHS and Austin Reeds both suffered from quality / price issuesLast edited by bobspud; 27 April 2016, 08:46.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostYes thats because they stopped making decent garments and followed the rest of the market down the tulip suit plug hole while trying to charge a premium for them.
There isn't a single quality retailer that offers a good suit these days.
They want you to buy a new suit every year or so. Like with shoes that aren't suppose to last more than 3 months and boots that are only suppose to last one season.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostSo how far back should you be forced to give up dividends? BP lost $4.1bn last year, does that mean I have to give all my dividends back?
The dividends were paid in good faith, at a time where the company was making money and covered its pension liability with a surplus, by all means take him to count for the bad deal in selling the company to a bunch of eejits, but don't penalise the man for making hay while the sun shined.
Philip Green takes the role of BMW in the Rover scandal. I don't think he did anything wrong.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: