• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Intel beat revenue forecasts"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Well they've been flogging the same donkey for the last 30 odd years & it's beginning to flag a bit
    Performance is still going up by virtue of more cores, but they are charging increasingly higher prices for that, they stifle desktops with just quad cores, cut out AVX512 from Skylake - so no performance improvements even in demanding applications like games, which is the last saving grace of PCs.

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Intel got much better idea about future of the business than analysts...
    I guess they see their future as a couple of guys working out of a lockup.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by _V_ View Post
    The point of this post was to highlight that Intel, even though they beat analyst expectations, are shedding 12,000 jobs.
    Intel got much better idea about future of the business than analysts...

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    replied


    The point of this post was to highlight that Intel, even though they beat analyst expectations, are shedding 12,000 jobs.

    Anyway, since this has descended into and Intel vs AMD, PC vs everything else type thread, I though I would post this:

    Remix OS - The Future of Android PC is Here

    Looks interesting. Android designed for PC hardware.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by diseasex View Post
    You're joking right?
    No.

    DOOMED.

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Intel should buy AMD, the chip market is now fragmented - mobiles got different suppliers, PCs are almost dead - they need all R&D they can get these days to make chips better without relying on manufacturing improvements which got too expensive and too slow.
    You're joking right?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Intel should buy AMD, the chip market is now fragmented - mobiles got different suppliers, PCs are almost dead - they need all R&D they can get these days to make chips better without relying on manufacturing improvements which got too expensive and too slow.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
    Just buy AMD chips then - way better value.
    Intel have been doomed due to competition from AMD for years, and then they were doomed due to competition from ARM. Somehow they seem to keep doing all right.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    They release CPUs with like 5% performance improvement, so there is no surprise that nobody is buying them, they don't want want to make cheap affordable 8 cores available - in Skylake they cut out AVX512 from desktop chip, feckers, so software can't even get speed up from that (server chips are expected to have it).

    I am still using 2011 CPU (overclocked nicely), should be able to manage easily until 2017-8.

    Oh, and Intel rips off companies using monopoly in server chips.
    Just buy AMD chips then - way better value.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    They release CPUs with like 5% performance improvement, so there is no surprise that nobody is buying them, they don't want want to make cheap affordable 8 cores available - in Skylake they cut out AVX512 from desktop chip, feckers, so software can't even get speed up from that (server chips are expected to have it).

    I am still using 2011 CPU (overclocked nicely), should be able to manage easily until 2017-8.

    Oh, and Intel rips off companies using monopoly in server chips.

    Leave a comment:


  • _V_
    started a topic Intel beat revenue forecasts

    Intel beat revenue forecasts

    Intel reports Q1 2016 earnings

    The company reported first-quarter earnings 54 cents a share excluding items, on $13.7 billion in sales. Analysts had expected Intel to report earnings of about 48 cents a share on $13.83 billion in revenue, according to a consensus estimate from Thomson Reuters.
    And so they?

    Intel announced Tuesday it would cut 12,000 jobs, or 11 percent of its workforce, by 2017
    The global economy is doomed....

Working...
X