• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Of course she is ..."

Collapse

  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    She's is ex-girlfriend not his ex-wife.

    She's therefore only entitled to money for child support until the child is 18. This is less than half his wealth.
    OK - so it looks like she can do the Loose Wimmin chat circuit / Hello magazine/ IACGMOOH / employ a ghost writer to pen her "life with a monster" story to the tabloids, still looks very bonkable - so could get them out for whatever lads mags are still going - the possibilities are endless - think she needs an Agent to manage her brief fame


    Getting them out for the lads mags looks the best option though

    Leave a comment:


  • Dactylion
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    She's is ex-girlfriend not his ex-wife.

    She's therefore only entitled to money for child support until the child is 18. This is less than half his wealth.
    Fair enough - but as he is a very honourable chap he would obviously see her & his child right - Wouldn't he?

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by Dactylion View Post
    Well she could divorce him and get 1/2 of his, not inconsiderable, wealth to support their child, and as a side effect her, in a pretty reasonable level for the rest of her life.
    She's is ex-girlfriend not his ex-wife.

    She's therefore only entitled to money for child support until the child is 18. This is less than half his wealth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dactylion
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    She has a child with him so what is she supposed to do?
    Well she could divorce him and get 1/2 of his, not inconsiderable, wealth to support their child, and as a side effect her, in a pretty reasonable level for the rest of her life.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    She has a child with him so what is she supposed to do?

    Leave a comment:


  • FatLazyContractor
    started a topic Of course she is ...

    Of course she is ...

    Adam Johnson's ex-girlfriend Stacey Flounders backs disgraced footballer despite ending their relationship - Mirror Online

Working...
X