• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Mark Carney: BoE could cut interest rates"

Collapse

  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Transcriber does not need to understand the tulip they are saying - imagine poor analysts who have to read and try to understand what they meant between the lines...
    Analysts need to keep it simple: by how many hundreds of percent will my house price increase under the Carney-Gidiot tag-team and how best can I speculate on this?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Yep. Imagine being a transcriber for that committee.
    Transcriber does not need to understand the tulip they are saying - imagine poor analysts who have to read and try to understand what they meant between the lines...

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    1. Start here with Money.
    2. Get divorced. Money = Money / 2;
    3. Let Gidiot have a go. Money = Money / 2;
    4. Let the banks apply negative rates and depositor haircuts. Money = Money / 2;
    5. And then you die - Gidiot gets half again.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
    Yes yes yes....this is all well and good, but what is it going to do for the price of my house?

    Leave a comment:


  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Yes yes yes....this is all well and good, but what is it going to do for the price of my house?

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    I don't necessarily believe that
    Probably a good idea since this is the guy who got slapped for rattling the markets not long ago by talking about a %5 rate rise over the course of the next year or two and then sharply back-pedalled once he realised the economy wasn't that hot, actually.

    In the States they've had monthly fees to maintain a savings account with less than $1000 balance and a fraction of a point of interest for years. We've never had it so good here.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Sadly I listened too. So boring I will never listen to that crap again.
    Yep. Imagine being a transcriber for that committee.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    Whether it does or not, that reporting is utter crap. I was listening to that committee (anorak, I know) and he was purely answering a hypothetical question about the lower bound they envisage. There was no change in policy direction implied.
    Sadly I listened too. So boring I will never listen to that crap again.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Whether it does or not, that reporting is utter crap. I was listening to that committee (anorak, I know) and he was purely answering a hypothetical question about the lower bound they envisage. There was no change in policy direction implied.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    They've already achieved their aim - most people in this country got very little money (cash or not) in the first place.
    1. Start here with Money.
    2. Get divorced. Money = Money / 2;
    3. Let Gidiot have a go. Money = Money / 2;
    4. Let the banks apply negative rates and depositor haircuts. Money = Money / 2;

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    One thing that would be essential in introducing a negative interest cashless World economy is World-wide coordination, and who is to say that isn't being discussed even now.
    They've already achieved their aim - most people in this country got very little money (cash or not) in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin@AS Financial View Post
    However, Carney said the Bank will not be taking interest rates negative, as this measure has “serious” implications on financial services.

    He said: “We have no intention, no interest in negative interest rates. ...
    I don't necessarily believe that.

    One thing that would be essential in introducing a negative interest cashless World economy is World-wide coordination, and who is to say that isn't being discussed even now.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by The_Equalizer View Post
    And anyone in the UK exporting stuff.
    +1

    Sterling is at lower point for USD than it was during Lehmans disaster, that tells you all about competence of UK Govt, in this particular case it's the only good thing they've done for me, I'd trade it gladly for stronger pound but no extra dividend taxes and 40% max tax band

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    I just wish the government would decide if they want people to save money or spend it already...
    We all need to spend all our money to boost the economy, whilst borrowing and reducing our debt levels, simultaneousy piling it into pensions for our future, all the while not being greedy with our pensions, plus pay lots of tax whilst carefully using tax breaks to increase our take home, goto line 1.

    Simples.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    I just wish the government would decide if they want people to save money or spend it already...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X