• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "oh dear: Rise in UK income tax receipts not enough to keep Osborne plan on track"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by ZARDOZ View Post
    Here's an idea scrap HS2. He's wasted over a billion on the plans and wages for the quango alone. A further 80 billion plus is needed. That's a lot of tax or cuts to something. Not to mention they have no idea where the energy to eun it will come from.
    I reckon he'll delay it. It's supposed to start actual work in 2017, yet not much is heard of it - delay means big paper wins for him, and why not, it's due to finish way past his own pathetic polical lifespan?

    What he should have done is to get BoE to fund it via "funny money" - that would reduce load on budget and also get some real stuff done with all that funny money given to banks

    Leave a comment:


  • ZARDOZ
    replied
    Here's an idea scrap HS2. He's wasted over a billion on the plans and wages for the quango alone. A further 80 billion plus is needed. That's a lot of tax or cuts to something. Not to mention they have no idea where the energy to eun it will come from.

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    Whenever I see him raking the coins out of the wishing well, I approach the small business owner with a white envelope and offer him a deal: the envelope for the coins and his vote. Usually, there’s an increased tax bill in the envelope, but a deal’s a deal!

    George Osborne

    On fiscal policy.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by clearedforlanding View Post
    The strongest opposition to his austerity plan comes from Conservative MPs.
    The real problem is that Conservative is silent on his totally non-Conservative policies of higher taxation, in my book it means that they are all guilty.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by clearedforlanding View Post
    An understanding of the field, especially in finance is pretty much a pre-requisite of making informed decisions.
    His family firm is loss making for years and his recent share of dividends was just £1200.

    He is not qualified to arrange a piss up in a brewery.

    Enough said ...

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The job of the chancellor and in fact any government minister is to guess which advice of their civil servants and special advisors is worth listening to. They are too busy (remember they have a constituency as well) to deal with small print.
    Which is pretty similar to the job of a C level executive. The difference is that with the exception of the CEO & CFO it is pretty mandatory to have built up experience in ones domain of expertise and the industry, to offer direction and strategy (avoided the peacock term 'vision') and make informed choices on advice from professionals.

    This guy failed as a journalist, heard from a university mate there was an opening at the conservative party central offices. He married the daughter of Lord Howell, wrote speeches for William, Hague - that went well and exchanged god father duties with David Cameron.

    An understanding of the field, especially in finance is pretty much a pre-requisite of making informed decisions. It was clearly demonstrated in his 2012 budget, his nadir, that he was a little under qualified. Better not heat up the Cornish pasties.

    His own constituents want him to spend more time on the economy and less time working as a Conservative strategist.

    The strongest opposition to his austerity plan comes from Conservative MPs.

    All he can now do is make deeper cuts, in particular in infrastructure, which puts a damper on his Northern Powerhouse proposals.

    He is inept and an example of cronyism at it's worst.

    Of interest to the regulars here, his Cardiff speech contained more banging on about borrowing for BTL now that his mates & key supporters have them.

    All said, he is a political animal, I'll give him that and the fiscal crisis will be used to his advantage to further his political ambitions.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    The job of the chancellor
    If he is too stupid to know what is needed in the first place, then he should not be taking on the job, especially that improtant.

    btw, in my plan I forgot 5) no VAT and no duty on vodka...
    Last edited by AtW; 19 February 2016, 21:05.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by clearedforlanding View Post
    A trust fund kid with a 2:1 in Modern History, who "relied on flawed advice" to change the property designated as his second home to pay less capital gains tax...

    With no financial qualification himself, a demonstrated history of depending on "flawed advice", I am completely and utterly surprised he cannot balance a budget.
    The job of the chancellor and in fact any government minister is to guess which advice of their civil servants and special advisors is worth listening to. They are too busy (remember they have a constituency as well) to deal with small print.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by clearedforlanding View Post
    I am completely and utterly surprised he cannot balance a budget.
    He knows what needs to be done in order to balance the budget... CUT SPENDING!!!

    He does not want to cut spending because he wants to be elected as PM in 2020.

    So, he chooses to screw over small groups of relatively well off people, but that's nowhere near enough money to pay off for all the crazy spending he is in charge of.

    Bear one thing in mind - interest payments on UK Gits are super low right now, what would happen with the budget with rates going up?

    When they got elected last year two thing should have happened -

    1) VAT increased to 25% over period of 5 years - 1% each year
    2) 10-15-20% (as necessary to reduce deficit) reduction of ALL spending without any ring fencing - it's only fair way.
    3) do whatever it takes to stop residential house price growth - create state company to build 1 mln houses per year to deal with demand
    4) cut taxes on employment - people should have more money in their pocket to decide themselves what they will spend it on

    Leave a comment:


  • clearedforlanding
    replied
    A trust fund kid with a 2:1 in Modern History, who "relied on flawed advice" to change the property designated as his second home to pay less capital gains tax...

    With no financial qualification himself, a demonstrated history of depending on "flawed advice", I am completely and utterly surprised he cannot balance a budget.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    -------------------------------->

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    It's a certainty that we are doomed™
    It is certain, but it's not official...

    I reckon he'll do some heavy duty damage around Capital Gains Tax - mostly untouched in last 2 attempts, but for how long?

    Stamp duty on expensive houses (£2 mln+) might go down as his overall take is reduced.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Fuel tax is a certainty to go up
    Probate is being messed with to generate more income
    Perhaps lower employment will help with less benefits / more employment taxes

    It's a certainty that we are doomed™

    Leave a comment:


  • oh dear: Rise in UK income tax receipts not enough to keep Osborne plan on track

    "A modest rise in income tax receipts last month was not enough to salvage George Osborne’s plan for a dramatic cut in government borrowing by the end of the financial year.

    In the last report on the public finances before next month’s budget, the Office for National Statistics said income tax receipts jumped by 4.7% compared with January last year to help produce an £11.2bn surplus in January, which is traditionally a healthy month for tax receipts.

    But the chancellor missed City expectations of a £12.3bn surplus and must now limit his borrowing to £7bn for the rest of the year, less than half the sum he borrowed in the same period in 2015.

    Osborne has warned of a “cocktail of threats” facing the UK economy this year and the likelihood that growth forecasts will need to be downgraded. He said that this strengthens his argument that Britain needs to balance its budget by 2020.

    Howard Archer, chief UK economist at IHS Global Insight, said Osborne is likely to be in the uncomfortable position of having to admit that he will miss his 2015-16 fiscal targets when he stands up to give his budget speech on 16 March. "

    Source: Rise in UK income tax receipts not enough to keep Osborne plan on track | Business | The Guardian

    He needs to increase taxes to at least 100% of total take, it's the only way to be sure!

    Labour would have done it anyway according to Waldork...

Working...
X