Usa! Usa! Usa!

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

seanraaron replied

29 January 2016, 09:29
It's a shame that the Republican Congress is too thick-headed to realise that this is what happens when the people who traditionally fund development of stuff used in space launches, NASA, typically get fecked-over come budget time in favour of overpriced crap like the F-35 and unnecessary foreign wars.
Leave a comment:
zeitghost started a topic Usa! Usa! Usa!

29 January 2016, 09:02
Usa! Usa! Usa!

Well they may have to buy RD180 engines off the Ruskies*, but at least now you'll be able to buy a proper, red blooded, American manufactured AK47.

Yay!

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/ak-47-assa...112620937.html

*https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/go...085955568.html

Can someone remind me how sensible it is to buy essentials such as engines for launch vehicles off your enemy?
Tags: None