• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hope you're paying yourself at least £10/hour"

Collapse

  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by Lost It View Post
    Just think of all the fixed rate VAT collections they would be waving goodbye to. Mind you I'd be willing to bet a shilling that HMRC haven't even considered this...
    We discussed it a while back.
    A real doozy, for HMRC, especially as finance companies cannot claim the VAT back.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lost It
    replied
    Outlaw one man bands?

    Just think of all the fixed rate VAT collections they would be waving goodbye to. Mind you I'd be willing to bet a shilling that HMRC haven't even considered this...

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
    There's little point. You can get more out if your spouse is a needy biatch company secretary, but if you're intent on taking all of it out, you may as well save yourself a lot of hassle and go through an umbrella co.
    Well, you might like the prestige and separation of business/personal? Right now I can't think of a good reason to do it unless I did start working actual consultant-style projects rather than team-based work with no fixed end.

    I'm too new to the game to have a clue how things could go as before landing this gig I was approached about a data centre build (very neat, but sadly internally filled after a positive interview) and a job doing backfill for a team member who was seconded to something else for a few months. Of course if the government eventually outlaws one-man companies then the decision is made for everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    So, I'll probably be labelled simple/naive (feel free to add whatever additional mockery you can come up with), but does anyone ever set up one of these PSC/Limited company things and pay themselves full pay instead of dividends? You know, only keeping money in the company account for business-related expenses like stationary and the like. Not trying cast aspersions or anything, I'm genuinely curious.
    There's little point. You can get more out if your spouse is a needy biatch company secretary, but if you're intent on taking all of it out, you may as well save yourself a lot of hassle and go through an umbrella co.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    I would very much doubt it, in IT, but, sure, in other trades.
    The old man had a LTD company, building, he didn't pay dividends, for example.
    Seems like such a hassle. I'm working with a guy who's been on this site for two years - no way in heck you could argue the job falls outside IR35. I asked him if he's concerned and he said "kinda." No kidding!

    Leave a comment:


  • diseasex
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    If you are aspirational _and_ young then the most sensible thing to do is leave this country.
    Leave where? I just came here because i'm aspirational af _and_ young...

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by seanraaron View Post
    So, I'll probably be labelled simple/naive (feel free to add whatever additional mockery you can come up with), but does anyone ever set up one of these PSC/Limited company things and pay themselves full pay instead of dividends? You know, only keeping money in the company account for business-related expenses like stationary and the like. Not trying cast aspersions or anything, I'm genuinely curious.
    I would very much doubt it, in IT, but, sure, in other trades.
    The old man had a LTD company, building, he didn't pay dividends, for example.

    Leave a comment:


  • seanraaron
    replied
    So, I'll probably be labelled simple/naive (feel free to add whatever additional mockery you can come up with), but does anyone ever set up one of these PSC/Limited company things and pay themselves full pay instead of dividends? You know, only keeping money in the company account for business-related expenses like stationary and the like. Not trying cast aspersions or anything, I'm genuinely curious.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    If you are aspirational _and_ young then the most sensible thing to do is leave this country.
    Yup, agreed.

    Not so young here, but, still considering doing just that.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View Post
    Voting Tory is fine, if you are stinking rich, but, no good if you are aspirational.
    Voting Labour is fine, if you have little, or nothing and want more of the pie, for little effort.
    If you are aspirational _and_ young then the most sensible thing to do is leave this country.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    OK "more borrowing" ?

    Or is it this? The inverted snobbery or cowardice of not wanting to be seen to vote Tory despite the fact that conservative ideals are what so many people live by?

    Why were so many people afraid to admit that they wanted to vote Tory? - Telegraph

    Yet on the outside these people will pretend to be labour supporters (just to supposedly give themselves some dubious veneer of credibility) despite the appalling outcomes that have been endured under their watch.
    I don't support, or pretend to support, any of them.

    Voting Tory is fine, if you are stinking rich, but, no good if you are aspirational.
    Voting Labour is fine, if you have little, or nothing and want more of the pie, for little effort.

    As for the rest, even a bigger bunch of losing, no hopers

    Leave a comment:


  • MrMarkyMark
    replied
    Originally posted by piotrkula View Post
    I think im just goint to find one of these offhsore "finance" / Umbrella companies things.

    I wanted to play fair, pay my income tax normally but this is taking a piss. No mileage allowance, if I dont pay my self this much then they seize the company.

    WTF?!
    Good luck with that.

    You will end up following those before you, HMRC breathing heavily down your neck, potentially up to the eyeballs in debt after retrospective payments are demanded.

    Its not worth it.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    But that was the entire point of the pension system, it was that those who were working should pay for the retired.
    Yes, but the country can't afford it, so expenditure on pensions should go down by same X% as other spending elements of the budget.

    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Problem with pensions is there is no means testing because those who are entitled and should claim more would refuse to.
    Means testing should be abolished - everyone who paid taxes should be entitled to pension, just because some were prudent not to spend all money does not mean they should not get what they were promised and paid for. Only option for refusal to supply such promises services should be full inflation-indexed refund of taxes paid by said person.

    Leave a comment:


  • piotrkula
    replied
    I think im just goint to find one of these offhsore "finance" / Umbrella companies things.

    I wanted to play fair, pay my income tax normally but this is taking a piss. No mileage allowance, if I dont pay my self this much then they seize the company.

    WTF?!

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    No pensions triple lock guarantee to buy their votes for sure.

    Budget should have been cut X% across the board (phased over 5 years to make it a bit easier) to meet spending with actual, already way too high tax income.

    Pensions is a big separate question - it's a ponzi scheme and everybody knows it.

    QE should have been used to fund HS2 and some other infrastructure projects - Bank of England to hold shares for those projects, possibly sold in the future - Corbyn wants that (not sure about shares bit).
    But that was the entire point of the pension system, it was that those who were working should pay for the retired.

    Unfortunately Thatcher was too lazy/scared to increase the pension age. In reality the pension age should be what it is going to be but the age increase should be more gradual e.g. those retiring right now should be retiring at 66 not 65.

    Problem with pensions is there is no means testing because those who are entitled and should claim more would refuse to.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X