Originally posted by clearedforlanding
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: BTL (Borrow-To-Let) DOOM
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "BTL (Borrow-To-Let) DOOM"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostBTL (Borrow-To-Let) should only be allowed in new houses, building of which was fully financed by the wanna be investors and they have to hold that stock for 20 years minimum - can't evict tenants unless they stop paying or cause real damage.
Leave a comment:
-
BTL (Borrow-To-Let) should only be allowed in new houses, building of which was fully financed by the wanna be investors and they have to hold that stock for 20 years minimum - can't evict tenants unless they stop paying or cause real damage.
Leave a comment:
-
Let me throw a suggestion out: Over a certain threshold number of properties BTL should only be allowed in shared ownership properties.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by clearedforlanding View PostSo protect the market for encumbents and place barriers to entry for new entrants?
Fine. This really isn't going to address the issue that people cannot afford first houses.
Leave a comment:
-
So protect the market for encumbents and place barriers to entry for new entrants?
Fine. This really isn't going to address the issue that people cannot afford first houses.
Leave a comment:
-
BTL (Borrow-To-Let) DOOM
" Buy-to-let loans are set to get more expensive under global plans to crack down on the sector, amid fears of an unsustainable boom in the market.
Global officials at the Basel Committee, which sets financial standards for the whole world, want banks to hold twice as much capital against mortgages when the repayments are dependent on income from tenants, joining the Bank of England and the Treasury in warning of growing risks in the sector.
That is because such loans will only be repaid when the property is occupied and the landlord may struggle if tenants cannot be found.
It comes after Chancellor George Osborne announced another new tax on landlords, increasing stamp duty on the purchase of second homes and investment properties.
Under Basel Committee rules, banks have to apply a 35pc risk weighting to residential mortgage loans with a loan-to-value ratio of between 60pc and 85pc.
That measure defines how much capital a bank has to hold against the loan to make sure it can deal with a downturn in the economy when more loans migh not be paid back.
But the new plan would mean doubling that weighting to 70pc if the loan is dependent on rental income. This would, in turn, double the capital that would have to be held against the loan. Such a change would drive up the cost of lending and reduce the supply of buy-to-let mortgages for buyers.
This standard model applies to all banks except the very largest, which are allowed to use their own risk weightings if they have enough data to satisfy regulators that they understand the market fully. However, the wider tightening up on buy-to-let does still affect those giant lenders. "
Source: Global regulators join crackdown on buy-to-let - Telegraph
All responsible Govts of the world must eliminate this clear and present danger of funds diverted away from their pension Ponzi schemesLast edited by AtW; 10 December 2015, 20:19.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: