• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Lefty luvvie quits the Labour party"

Collapse

  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by MarkT View Post
    My son is "retarded" well he gets called it every day at school because he's autistic, but I guess I'll let that pass.

    If the other Miliband had won and became leader in 2010 I doubt Osbourne would be chancellor, it'd be someone else, probably in a red tie.
    Well I can assure you that that has nothing to do with my reasons for calling Miliband that. Rather, it's the harebrained schemes he, Osborne etc come up with. And you're right, it's a gamble whoever it is. Doubt it'd be Ed Balls, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkT
    replied
    Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
    Maybe the other, non-retarded Miliband would suffice.
    My son is "retarded" well he gets called it every day at school because he's autistic, but I guess I'll let that pass.

    If the other Miliband had won and became leader in 2010 I doubt Osbourne would be chancellor, it'd be someone else, probably in a red tie.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Non-retarded for a politician - ie just one rather than 2-3 standard deviations below the mean IQ.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
    Maybe the other, non-retarded Miliband would suffice.
    You mean this one ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by MarkT View Post
    If he says he'll protect small business (I'm talking specifically for us here) and he kind of does, but I, for one, think he'll be gone by 2017/18.

    The reason the Tories think they can spank us is because we can't spank them back, if someone else lead the Labour Party and it was a credible opposition the Tories would look after their core vote a lot more.
    Maybe the other, non-retarded Miliband would suffice.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by MarkT View Post
    If he says he'll protect small business (I'm talking specifically for us here) and he kind of does, but I, for one, think he'll be gone by 2017/18.

    The reason the Tories think they can spank us is because we can't spank them back, if someone else lead the Labour Party and it was a credible opposition the Tories would look after their core vote a lot more.
    That is true get Banana Man in and the political landscape would change with the Tories having an opposition, or at the outside someone like Dan Jarvis

    It does no one any favours to have such a weak ineffective opposition

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkT
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Under what circumstances would they vote for Corbyn?
    If he says he'll protect small business (I'm talking specifically for us here) and he kind of does, but I, for one, think he'll be gone by 2017/18.

    The reason the Tories think they can spank us is because we can't spank them back, if someone else lead the Labour Party and it was a credible opposition the Tories would look after their core vote a lot more.

    Leave a comment:


  • LondonManc
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Under what circumstances would they vote for Corbyn?
    I think it would be more voters not voting at all with no credible party to go for.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by MarkT View Post
    He's hardly a left luvvie.....I did the same thing though, most people with brains have left or are leaving.

    However it could be the middle classes who spur him on to an unlikely victory if Osbourne keeps his attack on the self employed up! The difference between the middle classes and the working classes is of course that no matter how tulip The Tories treat the working classes, they still vote Tory.

    Where as the middle classes tend to vote for who is best for them.
    Under what circumstances would they vote for Corbyn?

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkT
    replied
    He's hardly a left luvvie.....I did the same thing though, most people with brains have left or are leaving.

    However it could be the middle classes who spur him on to an unlikely victory if Osbourne keeps his attack on the self employed up! The difference between the middle classes and the working classes is of course that no matter how tulip The Tories treat the working classes, they still vote Tory.

    Where as the middle classes tend to vote for who is best for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    started a topic Lefty luvvie quits the Labour party

    Lefty luvvie quits the Labour party

    Allegedly because saying he is fed up arguing with “the Corbytrons” and “just can’t stick with all the posturing tw*ts”.

    That warmed my cockles this morning

Working...
X