• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Solicitors stealing from disabled"

Collapse

  • BigRed
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Not all are greedy bastards
    I'd love to agree with you and have no grounds for not doing so, but this pro bono representation happens a lot and I can't help feeling there is something hidden. My gut feeling is I would rather trust a job agent.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Not all are greedy bastards

    His lawyer Julian Ribet, of Levison Meltzer Pigott, one of the leading family law firms and which had taken on the case for free

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    started a topic Solicitors stealing from disabled

    Solicitors stealing from disabled

    Afghan war hero wins divorce battle with wife who 'wasted' part of his £1m injuries payout - Telegraph

    Judge Chapman ruled Mrs Vaughan was entitled to just under £85,000 to cover her legal fees.

    Keeps the family law gravy train going.
Working...
X