• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "‘Buy-to-let tax will cut our income by 25pc.' How much will YOU lose?"

Collapse

  • AtW
    replied
    It's high time to tax CO2 emissions from residents and a very high tax on farts which is clearly a luxury...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Only 25% cut? It needs to be a 100% cut. Selfish f**kers are keeping youngsters off the housing ladder.

    It needs 100% tax on rental income. With no expenses allowed.

    And make it 200% on companies and anyone from outside the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Nah, those are true Tory friends, "foreign" investor as in offshore trust belonging to the right chaps who went to right schools ...

    Leave a comment:


  • mudskipper
    replied
    Excellent - I've got some money to invest. Sounds like there's some BTL bargains to be had in Stoke and Crewe.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheLordDave
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Thanks to Gideon you might become an accidental bankrupt...
    To be honest maybe that is the best course. Selling up and still owing the mortgage company 20k is not a position I want to be in.

    Neither is being a landlord and being responsible for the upkeep when the rent only just covers the mortgage. But if it is then tax smashed not really worth it at all.

    Maybe better to go bankrupt and let the bank have the keys.


    Bloody Tories.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheLordDave
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Where is that?
    South wales

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Let's get a foreign investor tax in next...

    http://www.propertywire.com/news/eur...011210028.html

    Leave a comment:


  • zeitghost
    replied
    Sounds like I'm not alone in hoping someone's going to wipe that smirk off his face.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by centurian View Post
    The rules don't start to bite for another 18 months and it will be 5 years before they fully take effect.
    Unlike the dividend taxes that kick in next year

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by TheLordDave View Post
    The bit that worries me is people like me with a mortgage on a house that isn't worth the mortgage amount, so can't afford to sell and have become a accidental landlord.
    Thanks to Gideon you might become an accidental bankrupt...

    Leave a comment:


  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Where is that?
    Northern Ireland most likely

    Negative equity afflicts 'half a million households' - BBC News

    Unfortunately, the rules can't adequately differentiate between "accidental" and "intentional" landlords.

    And quite bluntly I'm afraid, nor should it.

    The rules don't start to bite for another 18 months and it will be 5 years before they fully take effect.

    That should be more than enough time to formulate a plan of how to deal with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by TheLordDave View Post
    The bit that worries me is people like me with a mortgage on a house that isn't worth the mortgage amount, so can't afford to sell and have become a accidental landlord.
    Where is that?

    Leave a comment:


  • TheLordDave
    replied
    The bit that worries me is people like me with a mortgage on a house that isn't worth the mortgage amount, so can't afford to sell and have become a accidental landlord.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Surely the thread title should be Borrow-to-let

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    Only fly in the ointment is local councils sticking their noses in the trough CPRPL - I expect more councils will follow suit
    "Croydon Private Rented Property Licence

    As part of its drive to make Croydon a better place to rent, Croydon Council has designated the borough a Private Rented Property Licence area.

    This means that owners of every privately rented home in the borough must apply to the council for a Croydon Private Rented Property Licence (CPRPL). This becomes a legal requirement from 1 October 2015.

    Through the application process, the council will determine that the proposed licence holder is a "fit and proper" person to manage their properties.

    Landlords renting a property without a licence face fines of up to £20,000, while those that fail to comply with licence conditions can be prosecuted and fined up to £5,000."



    Looking forward to a big post on forum from MF...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X