- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: How do they get away with it?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How do they get away with it?"
Collapse
-
It's a rubbish article. The reason they paid so little was that they paid the vast majority of UK profit out as salary and bonus. Hector will have taken more tax from that than from any corporation tax due.
-
Article says they made a £28m loss, so why are they paying any CT?Originally posted by Jog On View PostThis is where I have a problem with this. If Facebook did only make so small a profit on their UK earnings that their tax bill is this small then fine.
However if they did not and they are another huge corp engaging in government facilitated massive tax avoidance that the likes of us are expected to subsidise then yes this needs to be addressed - by my mate Jezza in PMQs.
No more Facebook advertising for me!
Leave a comment:
-
This is where I have a problem with this. If Facebook did only make so small a profit on their UK earnings that their tax bill is this small then fine.Originally posted by unixman View PostTax avoidance by large corporations is kind of an industry in its own right. The corps are the customers, the big 4 consultancies the suppliers, and the government provides the legal framework, and occasionally legal havens (guernsey, cayman islands etc) to make it all work. The government also ensures that HMRC keep the focus on the little people while turning a blind eye to the corps.
However if they did not and they are another huge corp engaging in government facilitated massive tax avoidance that the likes of us are expected to subsidise then yes this needs to be addressed - by my mate Jezza in PMQs.
No more Facebook advertising for me!
Leave a comment:
-
I bet they are all tax avoiding contractor scumOriginally posted by FatLazyContractor View PostThey paid employees instead. These employees pay tax on their earnings, bonuses and dividends.
I dont quite see what's wrong
Leave a comment:
-
Tax avoidance by large corporations is kind of an industry in its own right. The corps are the customers, the big 4 consultancies the suppliers, and the government provides the legal framework, and occasionally legal havens (guernsey, cayman islands etc) to make it all work. The government also ensures that HMRC keep the focus on the little people while turning a blind eye to the corps.
Leave a comment:
-
I guess his rich parents had nothing to do with it.Originally posted by original PM View PostLook PG a non boomer who has managed to make his way in the world by working hard and not bitching about everyone else taking his opportunities.....
bet he can afford a house
Leave a comment:
-
What is your actual question ? Are you asking something like, if they can do it can I do it ? If so, nope, perish the thought.
Leave a comment:
-
Look PG a non boomer who has managed to make his way in the world by working hard and not bitching about everyone else taking his opportunities.....Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
bet he can afford a house
Leave a comment:
-
And anyway, they're an American internet business. Why should they be paying any UK tax?
Leave a comment:
-
They paid employees instead. These employees pay tax on their earnings, bonuses and dividends.
I dont quite see what's wrong
Leave a comment:
-
Do we like or dislike this one?Originally posted by billybiro View PostFacebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in 2014
Facebook paid £4,327 corporation tax in 2014 - BBC News
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Today 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Yesterday 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57

Leave a comment: