• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK jobless total rises by 25,000"

Collapse

  • FatLazyContractor
    replied
    I just realised I am a statistic now

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Meanwhile in other news...

    EU-born migrants working in the UK hits 2m for first time - Telegraph


    There has also been a significant rise in the number of Romanians and Bulgarians working in the UK, from 147,000 when restrictions were lifted in January 2014 to 189,000 in April to June 2015.

    The overall number of foreign-born workers in the UK, including both EU and non-EU workers, has risen to nearly 5million, fuelled by a surge in the number of people from India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.

    There has been a fall in the number of people born in Africa, South Africa, the US and Australia and New Zealand in the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    I thought that was just the UK?
    Apparently, consumers in other countries like to feel good about their house price too. But we Brits are especially enamoured with our house prices, and George Osborne's dial goes to 11. He's a canny bastward, I'll give him that.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    The new central banker buzzword is macroprudential regulation (e.g. the recent MMR here). In simple terms, take an area of systemic risk, such as mortgage lending, prod it with a stick and see what happens. Because that always ends well. Only, they'll never use a particularly big stick because we all know the "recovery" is predicated on the consumer feeling good about their house price.
    I thought that was just the UK?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Where do you go from there!
    The new central banker buzzword is macroprudential regulation (e.g. the recent MMR here). In simple terms, take an area of systemic risk, such as mortgage lending, prod it with a stick and see what happens. Because that always ends well. Only, they'll never use a particularly big stick because we all know the "recovery" is predicated on the consumer feeling good about their house price.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Ouch!

    Sweden (according to the article) has interest rates at -0.25%

    Where do you go from there!
    Errr, -0.5%?

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    Originally posted by alphadog View Post
    Looks like the Kiwi's have an even bigger problem (26pc annual house price inflation)...
    Ouch!

    Sweden (according to the article) has interest rates at -0.25%

    Where do you go from there!

    Leave a comment:


  • alphadog
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Sweden

    Looks like the Swede's have a similar problem...
    Looks like the Kiwi's have an even bigger problem...

    Auckland house prices up 26% in June year, buyers looking further afield: REINZ - Business - NZ Herald News
    Last edited by alphadog; 12 August 2015, 13:05.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...n-house-prices

    Looks like the Swede's have a similar problem...

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
    Yes, well I also believe the data set they focus on - at least officially - is far narrower (and more manipulated/massaged) than other indicators of economic performance. Perhaps not to the same extent as China's, but it still means these figures have little correlation with actual economic health. On the one hand, I don't think they can really afford to raise rates by a meaningful amount, what with the global credit bubble they've helped reflate and catapult skywards. On the other, if they don't, like you say, their already ineffective tools for dealing with another crisis will be no longer be there, and the market rate may then reassert itself forcefully. They rely on the perception of being in a position to do something. The election complicates matters as they're nowhere near as independent from political pressures as textbooks would have you think, so Yellen must be very nervous.

    David Stockman's blog is something I keep track of since he surveys a broad variety of websites and data, and little of it is suggestive of anything close to a recovery anywhere you care to look.
    Completely agree. Much of their credibility is built on perception, rather than actually being able to predict anything (patently, they can't). Unless the bottom falls out, I think the balance is shifting towards a couple of token rises quite soon. They don't want to start this in an election cycle, regardless of what they might say, but they also don't want to be caught with their pants down at the precipice of the next shock, unable to alter perception (if not reality). I think the rises will be tepid and will stall at a fairly low rate - more a token gesture and repositioning than a belief it's necessary to counter any future inflationary pressures.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    I guess the smart money is on this. OTOH, I do wonder about Yellen. She's painted as this uber-dove, but I don't think that's right. Honestly, I wouldn't be stunned by a rate rise this year (September if the August NFP comes in really strong). Despite what they say about being data dependent, I think that's only partly true, and they're starting to realize that we're pretty far into the business cycle. They have feck all ammo when the next crash happens (look at the diminishing returns from successive QE, and none of that has been unwound yet). At some point, I think there's a cross-over between crappy economic data and having to do something in order to get to a position where they can cut rates when the next crash happens.
    Yes, well I also believe the data set they focus on - at least officially - is far narrower (and more manipulated/massaged) than other indicators of economic performance. Perhaps not to the same extent as China's, but it still means these figures have little correlation with actual economic health. On the one hand, I don't think they can really afford to raise rates by a meaningful amount, what with the global credit bubble they've helped reflate and catapult skywards. On the other, if they don't, like you say, their already ineffective tools for dealing with another crisis will be no longer be there, and the market rate may then reassert itself forcefully. They rely on the perception of being in a position to do something. The election complicates matters as they're nowhere near as independent from political pressures as textbooks would have you think, so Yellen must be very nervous.

    David Stockman's blog is something I keep track of since he surveys a broad variety of websites and data, and little of it is suggestive of anything close to a recovery anywhere you care to look.
    Last edited by Zero Liability; 12 August 2015, 12:25.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    UK jobless total rises by 25,000

    On past trends it could be anything from NOW-5 years away.

    My instincts say the end of 2017... Gives time for a rise in oil and the referendum result.

    Last edited by PurpleGorilla; 12 August 2015, 12:14.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Predictions for the next economic crash?
    Not really TBH, I'm surprised it hasn't happened already. Everyone could see China coming a mile off, and I'd be amazed if they don't trigger it, given the cack-handed nature of all these policy interventions (they can't help themselves). Everyone knows the official growth figures are a joke. Commodities and shipping prices etc. tell us everything we need to know. Much of the recovery has been illusory, global demand remains weak, and there's literally no ammo left. All sorts of asset prices are primed for a kicking (property being top of the list). The timing or precise trigger is anyone's guess though.

    Leave a comment:


  • PurpleGorilla
    replied
    UK jobless total rises by 25,000

    Originally posted by jamesbrown View Post
    I guess the smart money is on this. OTOH, I do wonder about Yellen. She's painted as this uber-dove, but I don't think that's right. Honestly, I wouldn't be stunned by a rate rise this year (September if the August NFP comes in really strong). Despite what they say about being data dependent, I think that's only partly true, and they're starting to realize that we're pretty far into the business cycle. They have feck all ammo when the next crash happens (look at the diminishing returns from successive QE, and none of that has been unwound yet). At some point, I think there's a cross-over between crappy economic data and having to do something in order to get to a position where they can cut rates when the next crash happens.
    Predictions for the next economic crash?

    Last edited by PurpleGorilla; 12 August 2015, 12:04.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesbrown
    replied
    Originally posted by Zero Liability View Post
    I'd say the issue is more the policies promoting easy credit, which cause it, as opposed to the symptom. Anyway, we'll probably see the Fed holding off on any meaningful rate rises until the next U.S. election is over and the BOE doing the same, with some occasionally hawkish commentary to make it seem like it's around the corner. I fully expect any rate increases in the near future to be minimal and insignificant, far below where market conditions would warrant.
    I guess the smart money is on this. OTOH, I do wonder about Yellen. She's painted as this uber-dove, but I don't think that's right. Honestly, I wouldn't be stunned by a rate rise this year (September if the August NFP comes in really strong). Despite what they say about being data dependent, I think that's only partly true, and they're starting to realize that we're pretty far into the business cycle. They have feck all ammo when the next crash happens (look at the diminishing returns from successive QE, and none of that has been unwound yet). At some point, I think there's a cross-over between crappy economic data and having to do something in order to get to a position where they can cut rates when the next crash happens.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X