- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Kapitalism
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Kapitalism"
Collapse
-
Kapitalism
Elderly couple landed with £500k court bill after losing claim against Goldman Sachs banker
"An elderly couple who accused their banker landlord of a money-driven bid to evict them from their home of 50 years have been handed a £500,000 court bill - after a judge found they moved out in the 1960s.
Robert Clarke, 81, and wife Cherry, 72, said ex-Goldman Sachs financier Hugues Lepic was only interested in the cash he could make by kicking them out of their mews home in an expensive part of Chelsea.
But the couple are now facing a huge bill for back rent and lawyers' fees after a judge found they had actually "decamped" from the home, yards from the multi-millionaire's £10 million mansion, in 1968.
Vindicating Mr Lepic, Judge Nigel Gerald said the couple had moved to a cottage in Surrey after their first child was born and Mrs Clarke was pregnant with their second.
Retired solicitor Mr Clarke, who claimed to have a protected tenancy, had "deliberately chosen not to come to court and give evidence so as to avoid having to tell the truth", said the judge.
And his wife had made a "series of dishonest and untruthful statements" in court to back up his claim to be a protected tenant, he continued. "
Source: Elderly couple landed with £500k court bill after losing claim against Goldman Sachs banker - Telegraph
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Young people not in education, employment or training isn’t a contractor’s problem. It’s a problem for us all Today 05:26
- How does HMRC’s forward interest change benefit contractors? Yesterday 04:22
- What are Bills of Exchange, and should HMRC's alert worry umbrella contractors? Jun 3 04:09
- Bills of Exchange fail to avoid new umbrella company rules, says HMRC Jun 2 05:32
- Is permanent employment still the safer bet? Yes, but it's a lot less safe than it used to be. Jun 1 04:34
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLA) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Is your Director’s Loan Account (DLS) a target of HMRC’s closer look at close companies? May 29 04:45
- Contractors, are you making any of the five big limited company bank account mistakes of 2026? May 28 05:51
- ‘Welcome’ increase in HMRC mileage rates for contractors using their own cars for work May 27 05:18
- King’s Speech 2026 including a welcome Late Payments Bill still leaves contractors short May 26 04:42

Leave a comment: