- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Kapitalism
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Kapitalism"
Collapse
-
Kapitalism
Elderly couple landed with £500k court bill after losing claim against Goldman Sachs banker
"An elderly couple who accused their banker landlord of a money-driven bid to evict them from their home of 50 years have been handed a £500,000 court bill - after a judge found they moved out in the 1960s.
Robert Clarke, 81, and wife Cherry, 72, said ex-Goldman Sachs financier Hugues Lepic was only interested in the cash he could make by kicking them out of their mews home in an expensive part of Chelsea.
But the couple are now facing a huge bill for back rent and lawyers' fees after a judge found they had actually "decamped" from the home, yards from the multi-millionaire's £10 million mansion, in 1968.
Vindicating Mr Lepic, Judge Nigel Gerald said the couple had moved to a cottage in Surrey after their first child was born and Mrs Clarke was pregnant with their second.
Retired solicitor Mr Clarke, who claimed to have a protected tenancy, had "deliberately chosen not to come to court and give evidence so as to avoid having to tell the truth", said the judge.
And his wife had made a "series of dishonest and untruthful statements" in court to back up his claim to be a protected tenant, he continued. "
Source: Elderly couple landed with £500k court bill after losing claim against Goldman Sachs banker - Telegraph
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Today 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Yesterday 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Yesterday 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Yesterday 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Yesterday 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Yesterday 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: