• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Plane stupid -up there with foxhunting"

Collapse

  • unixman
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    To be fair, it is the south east that has the capacity problem, not the rest of Britain.
    Yes that's the point. It has a capacity problem because there is too much infrastructure already there, attracting too many people, so the airports are now lagging behind.

    Put a mega airport in Brum, and watch Brum catch fire and the M25 become usable once again. You have to bite the bullet and light fires elsewhere, instead of standing round a single brazier in the SE.

    London's function is to shepherd the country as a whole, not to serve itself until it drowns in its own obesity.

    Sorry for the demented spluttering. I gotta cut back on the coffee.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    Let's cram more infrastructure into the dirty, smoky, overcrowded, squeezed, smelly, grimy South East. After all, London must compete with <random capital>, it's not as if it has any responsible role in managing the rest of Britain.
    To be fair, it is the south east that has the capacity problem, not the rest of Britain.

    Leave a comment:


  • MicrosoftBob
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    All for them in this case, whether they are toffs or not.

    Apart from anything else a third Heathrow runway would probably mean demolishing a fine old medievil church and nearby tithe barn at Harmondsworth.

    What a waste, considering HTOL planes will probably be obsolete within 50 years, and long runways no longer required.

    Also, what's wrong with Boris Johnson's idea of a floating airport in the Thames estuary?!
    Isn't there enough unexploded ordnance nearby to cause issues ?

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Does that invalidate what it says?
    Suppose that there are 1000 monkeys working on 1000 typewriters. If each monkey can type 10 characters per second, what are the odds that they can produce copy for a website on the Internet where no-one knows that its only a dog in a tutu that reads it

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Lets be fair. The government is proposing HS2.

    Though only to suck cheap labour into London....
    It is not. it is for rich Londoners to travel to their manufacturing hovels without having to touch local people

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    Let's cram more infrastructure into the dirty, smoky, overcrowded, squeezed, smelly, grimy South East. After all, London must compete with <random capital>, it's not as if it has any responsible role in managing the rest of Britain.
    Lets be fair. The government is proposing HS2.

    Though only to suck cheap labour into London....

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    Let's cram more infrastructure into the dirty, smoky, overcrowded, squeezed, smelly, grimy South East. After all, London must compete with <random capital>, it's not as if it has any responsible role in managing the rest of Britain.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
    Spiked is no better than its predecessor, Living Marxism, which was never Marxist, and after a misjudged libel case, no longer Living.
    Does that invalidate what it says?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    All for them in this case, whether they are toffs or not.

    Apart from anything else a third Heathrow runway would probably mean demolishing a fine old medievil church and nearby tithe barn at Harmondsworth.

    What a waste, considering HTOL planes will probably be obsolete within 50 years, and long runways no longer required.

    Also, what's wrong with Boris Johnson's idea of a floating airport in the Thames estuary?!

    Leave a comment:


  • pjclarke
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    You do read some really stupid websites. Why not just stick to pron?
    Spiked is no better than its predecessor, Living Marxism, which was never Marxist, and after a misjudged libel case, no longer Living.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    You do read some really stupid websites. Why not just stick to pron?
    I am becoming a leftie. Only I struggle with getting the rhythm "right"

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    You do read some really stupid websites. Why not just stick to pron?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    started a topic Plane stupid -up there with foxhunting

    Plane stupid -up there with foxhunting

    And here is another one: Plane Stupid: return of the snobs | Environment | Tourism and travel | Transport | spiked

Working...
X