• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Living Wage

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Living Wage"

Collapse

  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Especially that archaic and hard to understand dividends tax credit system...

    Tory s

    Last time I voted me thinking.

    Such a material change should have been in their manifesto.
    You are probably more used to a 5 year plan and the odd purge cycle

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    Especially that archaic and hard to understand dividends tax credit system...

    Tory s

    Last time I voted me thinking.

    Such a material change should have been in their manifesto.
    Manifesto is to win votes. Doesn't matter, in terms of votes, whether we get stiffed or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I don't see it as anything other than correcting the tax credit system.
    Especially that archaic and hard to understand dividends tax credit system...

    Tory s

    Last time I voted me thinking.

    Such a material change should have been in their manifesto.

    Leave a comment:


  • minestrone
    replied
    Originally posted by Contreras View Post
    Does anybody seriously believe that the National Minimum Living Wage is anything other than a deliberate inflationary measure?
    I don't see it as anything other than correcting the tax credit system.

    Leave a comment:


  • Contreras
    replied
    Does anybody seriously believe that the National Minimum Living Wage is anything other than a deliberate inflationary measure?

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by darmstadt View Post

    Why didn't Osbourne put his mouth ahead of his balls and put into law that both sexes get paid exactly the same when doing the same job
    They do. They have done for a very long time.
    The only way to remove the pay gap (I have no idea why you'd want to, but if you did) would be to stop men & women from choosing their own career paths.

    For example, you'd have to stop men from choosing to be surgeons so much, and stop women from choosing to work in paediatrics so much, in favour of being a surgeon. Or measure 'the same job' less generally.


    You'd also have to force more men to only work part-time, and force more women to leave their children in the care of strangers, or their husbands (which may fit into them working less hours nicely), while they work full-time.

    But... why?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Flashman View Post
    'Cost of living' ? Housing benefit. Tax credits. Free healthcare.
    Try turning up on their doorstep and getting that lot in America or Australia.
    Don't know about Australia, but cost of living in USA is a lot lower than UK.

    Housing benefit, tax credits all going in this country, that was the reason why it was possible to have such low minimum wage - taxpayer subsidy to some employers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flashman
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    And costs of living in UK ought to be pretty high up there too...
    'Cost of living' ? Housing benefit. Tax credits. Free healthcare.

    Try turning up on their doorstep and getting that lot in America or Australia.

    Leave a comment:


  • darmstadt
    replied
    However, in keeping with policy, the living wage for women will, of course, be less than that for men.

    Why didn't Osbourne put his mouth ahead of his balls and put into law that both sexes get paid exactly the same when doing the same job: UK has sixth-largest male-female pay gap in EU - Telegraph

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    £9 p/h will be the highest minimum wage in Europe, seemingly.
    And costs of living in UK ought to be pretty high up there too...

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    £9 p/h will be the highest minimum wage in Europe, seemingly.

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by unixman View Post
    I've got no problem with living or minimum wage. Increasing it a lot might make immigration worse though, by making low paid jobs more attractive to EU citizens. Or not, if it makes work more attractive to British citizens too.
    Would you have a problem with it if your son or daughter left school and it was illegal for them to get a job, because the marginal productivity they were able to add was less than £9 per hour?

    Leave a comment:


  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    It worked even better in times of Dickens when kids were doing their bit for society by mining for coal!

    Did well for child mortality rates.

    Leave a comment:


  • unixman
    replied
    I've got no problem with living or minimum wage. Increasing it a lot might make immigration worse though, by making low paid jobs more attractive to EU citizens. Or not, if it makes work more attractive to British citizens too.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    Funny thing is the miners fought running battles with the police to keep their hellhole jobs....
    That may have something to do with:-

    Mining jobs were well paid.
    Mining was a "job for life" they wanted to preserve that.
    Allowances for all sorts of stuff were freely available and lucrative.
    Paid holidays were good.
    The unionisation was very strong (for good historical reasons) and the miners knew that they held a lot of power collectively.
    Entire communities revolved around each pit, the miners and their families wanted to protect those.

    There were more than a few other reasons.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X