Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
18 Months & the best they can do is get someone saying someone takes bungs and Sam's son saying he's close to his dad. The bit with Rednapp was laughable. 'He's broken rules by talking to us'. NO! You're talking to him.
Poor. V.Poor.
The BBC legal team probably stripped out anything interesting. They don't want to take any risks post Hutton.
I knew there was someone who did, just couldn't imagine who would like half-assed regurgitated 70's rock played badly through crappy distortion.
(Other than the meejah, of course) Or perhaps I'm being presumptious, perhaps you work in the meejah, that would explain a lot actually.
18 Months & the best they can do is get someone saying someone takes bungs and Sam's son saying he's close to his dad. The bit with Rednapp was laughable. 'He's broken rules by talking to us'. NO! You're talking to him.
Leave a comment: