Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
For dear old Freako, this relates to the perfidy of government, particularly in attempting to prosecute people for stuff which parts of government had approved.
Odd really.
Well, not really.
Much what one might expect, all in all.
Scott identified three main areas of democratic concern. First, the Import, Export and Customs Powers (Defence) Act 1939 was emergency legislation passed at the outbreak of the Second World War.
It allowed the government to issue regulations which were not subject to resolutions in Parliament, for the duration of the emergency, which would make it a criminal offence to export particular goods to particular countries.
While the Act should have been lapsed in 1945, it remained in force, and had been modified in 1990 so as to become part of the Import and Export Control Act 1990. [1]
The second area was the failure of ministerial accountability; the principle that "for every action of a servant of the crown a minister is answerable to Parliament".
The third area was that of Public interest immunity certificates, which had been issued during the Matrix Churchill trial.
As a result of these certificates, innocent men were in danger of being sent to prison, because the government would not allow the defence counsel to see the documents that would exonerate their clients.
While some of these contained potentially sensitive intelligence material, many were simply internal communications: the certificates were intended to protect the Ministers and civil servants who had written the communications, rather than the public interest.
They had some massive train mounted cannon that was used against Sevastopol and they had to change the barrel after 200 shots I think. I don't think they ever changed the barrel.
This one though was fixed in the rock and pointed at London. Allies bombed it before it was ever fired I think.
They had some massive train mounted cannon that was used against Sevastopol and they had to change the barrel after 200 shots I think. I don't think they ever changed the barrel.
Also by this time so many German agents had been turned and were feeding back deliberately false data re the V weapons strike success, or many more might have hit populous areas.
Leave a comment: