- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Gary Glitter and retrospection
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Gary Glitter and retrospection"
Collapse
-
Not at all.Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostSo retrospection is ok for s58 - but not for nonces?
HMRC are not upholding the law and are a law unto themselves
Leave a comment:
-
nothing when ones got their thumb deep upside.Originally posted by fullyautomatix View PostI think the rule of thumb is,
You pay tax => You are in the system and you get harassed.
You don't pay any tax => You are not in the system.
There is however nothing stopping Her Majesty's Rascal C**ts to crap on your face.
Leave a comment:
-
I think the rule of thumb is, if you are going to use a loophole to avoid or evade tax, dont take the piss. If you avoid 100K of tax and are in the high earning bracket, you can be sure at some point HMRC's radar will pick it up.
Leave a comment:
-
The judge is correct. He is saying that he upholds the law and he is not a law unto himself.
Leave a comment:
-
He will look great with glitter on his chocolate starfish. I sincerely hope that there is coarse sand on it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Leave a comment: