Insane in the membrane

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

GlenW replied

23 December 2014, 10:33
Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post

And this affects invoicing how?

I don't even know what the feck it means.
Leave a comment:
DimPrawn replied

23 December 2014, 10:19
And this affects invoicing how?
Leave a comment:
yasockie started a topic Insane in the membrane

22 December 2014, 13:45
Insane in the membrane

How do you reconcile the two competing facts:
1. A fully frictionless market yields no particular competitive advantage nor a local monopoly to any particular player.
2. The project is about making the system more efficient (frictionless) so that the company has lower TCO.

I think I am getting a little more insane as days go by - I am told to optimise and deliver, but if I deliver too well I get criticised for creating a market that is too competitive where the org has no upper hand.

In other words make it a little more efficient, just not too efficient.
Tags: None