1. Contracting
    1. General
      1. Brexit
    2. Business / Contracts
      1. Coronavirus Assistance
    3. Accounting / Legal
      1. Umbrella Companies
      2. HMRC Scheme Enquiries
      3. The Future of Contracting
      4. IR35 Reform
    4. Technical
    5. Welcome / FAQs
  2. Social
    1. Light Relief
    2. Social / Events
  • Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: bandwidth madness

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "bandwidth madness"

Collapse
  • Tasslehoff
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    What if a single copper wire could maintain multiple channels without compromising Ohms law? By that I mean the bandwidth of each channel would be currently equal to the material's physical limit as is used in current CAT6 cable.

    What if I could show you a way to use the same cable but carry 500 times more information, would it be worth something to you laddy?

    Stay tuned... if me math works, the next step is to submit a paper to the IEEE journal for peer review, which last cost me £1500
    Instead of using 1,0 use 1,0,2. <taps nose>

    Leave a comment:

  • tractor
    replied
    ...

    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    What if a single copper wire could maintain multiple channels without comprising Ohms law? By that I mean the bandwidth of each channel would be currently equal to the material's physical limit as is used in current CAT6 cable.

    What if I could show you a way to use the same cable but carry 500 times more information, would it be worth something to you laddy?

    Stay tuned... if me math works, the next step is to submit a paper to the IEEE journal for peer review, which last cost me £1500
    Sky told me that and when I signed up, they piggy backed me onto the BT network and I got 275mb/s because I am 4.5k from the exchange.

    Leave a comment:

  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    Nurse! Nurse!
    Electric fields are so yesterday.

    Leave a comment:

  • scooterscot
    started a topic bandwidth madness

    bandwidth madness

    What if a single copper wire could maintain multiple channels without compromising Ohms law? By that I mean the bandwidth of each channel would be currently equal to the material's physical limit as is used in current CAT6 cable.

    What if I could show you a way to use the same cable but carry 500 times more information, would it be worth something to you laddy?

    Stay tuned... if me math works, the next step is to submit a paper to the IEEE journal for peer review, which last cost me £1500
    Last edited by scooterscot; 11 November 2014, 12:56.
    Tags: None

Advertisers

  1. Contracting
    1. General
      1. Brexit
    2. Business / Contracts
      1. Coronavirus Assistance
    3. Accounting / Legal
      1. Umbrella Companies
      2. HMRC Scheme Enquiries
      3. The Future of Contracting
      4. IR35 Reform
    4. Technical
    5. Welcome / FAQs
  2. Social
    1. Light Relief
    2. Social / Events
Working...
X