• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Australian man convicted of indecency with a cartoon"

Collapse

  • SpontaneousOrder
    replied
    I've not given any time to consider it. Does seem like a short leap from there to thoughtcrime though.
    I do think, though, that if people really were more interested in protecting kids than having a boogie man to vent at, then they wouldn't make criminals of people who viewed material (in this case it might be different because there was active participation) - criminalising it drives it underground, whereas if protecting children is a priority then help should be available to people with those kinds of thoughts.

    If someone is too scared to seek help at the start, then it's much more likely that they'll take it that step too far at some later point in time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    Strange one this.

    1. There doesn't seem to be a victim in his case. No children were involved.

    2. Can you use an Agent Provocateur to incite a person to commit a crime that, for all they know, he might not otherwise commit?

    3. Is it a crime to take actions that you believe is committing a crime, even if you are not?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    started a topic Australian man convicted of indecency with a cartoon

    Australian man convicted of indecency with a cartoon

    Webcam sex with fake girl Sweetie leads to sentence

    Obviously the intent to offend was present, and real kids will be slightly safer while this critter is behind bars.

    But is it really proper to prosecute and jail someone for interacting with an animated character, however short sighted they may be and convinced they were dealing with a real child?

Working...
X