• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "At last something decent on the BBC"

Collapse

  • Helios
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss
    Who did Adam and Eve's children shag?
    Wasnt it the virgin Mary?

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard
    OK, we've heard enough accusations of incest about the creationists.

    In the interests of balance, let's not forget that Charles Darwin married his cousin Emma Wedgewood, and Emma's brother married CD's sister.

    So what ? At least he wasn't a hypocrite. It is not possible, even in theory, for Adam and Eve's children to have procreated with anything other than their parents or brothers and sisters. Even theologians accept this. The point is, incest was banned at a later stage of the Old Testament (Lev.) when it was realised that it causes health problems. So without any documented explanation in the Old Testament about why God allowed it at first and not later, it could be reasoned that God (or more likely the authors of the Adam and Eve story) made a mistake. There is exactly the same issue with Noah and his wife.

    Here is a link to a Christian think-tank attempting to explain the incest in Genesis :-

    http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qincest.html

    Note the mention of 'radiation' pouring through the 'water canopy' after the Flood (ie. after Adam and Eve) being the reason to prohibit incest. Yeaah ! They should stop trying to come up with silly excuses and just see the Old Testament for what it really is, which is a historical collection of genuinely thought-provoking but allegorical tales and folklore.

    As for Darwin, it's not just a matter of proving Darwin's original theories or his 19th century writings were completely wrong or completely right. He lived a long time ago and it's not likely he was 100% correct given the level of scientific knowledge of the time. We have come a long way since then and there is a much greater body of knowledge and scientific evidence around nowadays to improve on and modify his original theories.

    As for the creationists ; maybe a big flood etc actually happened somewhere in the Middle East at some time in the past, but it doesn't also mean the dinosaurs or early humans didn't exist - and I don't remember them being mentioned in the Old Testament. The hard-line creationists can't logically explain away the human history that isn't in the Old Testament. Maybe some of the OT is based in historical truth but not every word, every sentence, every nuance. Maybe the reason given for these unexplained items is that they are just God's traps for the unworthy ? But then again, maybe reason just not in the creationists skillset because they are starting off from the premise that the Old Testament is historical truth and trying to prove it so, rather than examining the known facts with an open mind.

    If they accepted that the Old Testament is a Middle Eastern Jewish folk story told to explain why their people are on this Earth, much like the creation stories of Australian aborigines, then they would be able to better reconcile the scientific evidence with their deeply held beliefs.

    Ok, rant over. I'm off to bed. 'night.

    Leave a comment:


  • Emperor Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by TwinGoldDaleks
    How are you doing, Emp?
    Not bad, Twin. How many humans have you robotised today?

    Leave a comment:


  • TwinGoldDaleks
    replied
    Originally posted by Emperor Dalek
    How are you doing, Emp?

    Leave a comment:


  • Emperor Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    How many children did Adam and Eve have? The Bible does not give us a specific number. Adam and Eve had Cain (Genesis 4:1), Abel (Genesis 4:2), Seth (Genesis 4:25), and many other sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4). With likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.

    From www.getanswers.org

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    With likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.

    From www.getanswers.org

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Crown Royal
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    OK, we've heard enough accusations of incest about the creationists.

    In the interests of balance, let's not forget that Charles Darwin married his cousin Emma Wedgewood, and Emma's brother married CD's sister.

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    As in "Iesu, mae o'n rel coc oen"

    Leave a comment:


  • Phoenix
    replied
    Originally posted by oraclesmith
    I guess if they were all closely inter-related, they would soon look like a bunch of Kentucky hillbillies !

    Or the Welsh?

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    What were those people like if they weren't descended from the first man and woman?

    I guess if they were all closely inter-related, they would soon look like a bunch of Kentucky hillbillies !

    Leave a comment:


  • CaribbeanPirate
    replied
    Originally posted by Phoenix
    Ah Sh*t.........I thought the weather girl had taken her top off!
    I still miss Tiffani Bannister's Big City Tips on L!ve TV. It was the best business news on the telly.

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    The land of Nod - what were those people like if they weren't descended from the first man and woman?

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Originally posted by Chico
    How many children did Adam and Eve have? The Bible does not give us a specific number. Adam and Eve had Cain (Genesis 4:1), Abel (Genesis 4:2), Seth (Genesis 4:25), and many other sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4). With likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.

    From www.getanswers.org
    All siblings though. Must be OK then !!!!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X