Originally posted by Bagpuss
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: At last something decent on the BBC
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "At last something decent on the BBC"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by thunderlizardOK, we've heard enough accusations of incest about the creationists.
In the interests of balance, let's not forget that Charles Darwin married his cousin Emma Wedgewood, and Emma's brother married CD's sister.
So what ? At least he wasn't a hypocrite. It is not possible, even in theory, for Adam and Eve's children to have procreated with anything other than their parents or brothers and sisters. Even theologians accept this. The point is, incest was banned at a later stage of the Old Testament (Lev.) when it was realised that it causes health problems. So without any documented explanation in the Old Testament about why God allowed it at first and not later, it could be reasoned that God (or more likely the authors of the Adam and Eve story) made a mistake. There is exactly the same issue with Noah and his wife.
Here is a link to a Christian think-tank attempting to explain the incest in Genesis :-
http://www.christian-thinktank.com/qincest.html
Note the mention of 'radiation' pouring through the 'water canopy' after the Flood (ie. after Adam and Eve) being the reason to prohibit incest. Yeaah ! They should stop trying to come up with silly excuses and just see the Old Testament for what it really is, which is a historical collection of genuinely thought-provoking but allegorical tales and folklore.
As for Darwin, it's not just a matter of proving Darwin's original theories or his 19th century writings were completely wrong or completely right. He lived a long time ago and it's not likely he was 100% correct given the level of scientific knowledge of the time. We have come a long way since then and there is a much greater body of knowledge and scientific evidence around nowadays to improve on and modify his original theories.
As for the creationists ; maybe a big flood etc actually happened somewhere in the Middle East at some time in the past, but it doesn't also mean the dinosaurs or early humans didn't exist - and I don't remember them being mentioned in the Old Testament. The hard-line creationists can't logically explain away the human history that isn't in the Old Testament. Maybe some of the OT is based in historical truth but not every word, every sentence, every nuance. Maybe the reason given for these unexplained items is that they are just God's traps for the unworthy ? But then again, maybe reason just not in the creationists skillset because they are starting off from the premise that the Old Testament is historical truth and trying to prove it so, rather than examining the known facts with an open mind.
If they accepted that the Old Testament is a Middle Eastern Jewish folk story told to explain why their people are on this Earth, much like the creation stories of Australian aborigines, then they would be able to better reconcile the scientific evidence with their deeply held beliefs.
Ok, rant over. I'm off to bed. 'night.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TwinGoldDaleksHow are you doing, Emp?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChicoHow many children did Adam and Eve have? The Bible does not give us a specific number. Adam and Eve had Cain (Genesis 4:1), Abel (Genesis 4:2), Seth (Genesis 4:25), and many other sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4). With likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.
From www.getanswers.org
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChicoWith likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.
From www.getanswers.org
Leave a comment:
-
OK, we've heard enough accusations of incest about the creationists.
In the interests of balance, let's not forget that Charles Darwin married his cousin Emma Wedgewood, and Emma's brother married CD's sister.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oraclesmithI guess if they were all closely inter-related, they would soon look like a bunch of Kentucky hillbillies !
Or the Welsh?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wendigo100What were those people like if they weren't descended from the first man and woman?
I guess if they were all closely inter-related, they would soon look like a bunch of Kentucky hillbillies !
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PhoenixAh Sh*t.........I thought the weather girl had taken her top off!
Leave a comment:
-
The land of Nod - what were those people like if they weren't descended from the first man and woman?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ChicoHow many children did Adam and Eve have? The Bible does not give us a specific number. Adam and Eve had Cain (Genesis 4:1), Abel (Genesis 4:2), Seth (Genesis 4:25), and many other sons and daughters (Genesis 5:4). With likely hundreds of years of child-bearing capability, Adam and Eve likely had 50+ children in their lifetime.
From www.getanswers.org
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: