Did they expect us to treat them with any respect ?

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Antman replied

12 September 2014, 07:57
Originally posted by scooterscot View Post

Indeed.

You're thinking of the tories to whom you must doff your cap lol?

EDIT: Effing tories I forgot
Leave a comment:
scooterscot replied

12 September 2014, 07:37
Originally posted by The Spartan View Post

97% isn't it? Still lets see if that translates to votes cast it'd be great if it did, but like I've said previously if it's a close run thing there are going to be plenty of people that are p****d off that it didn't go their way.

Indeed.
Leave a comment:
The Spartan replied

12 September 2014, 07:23
Originally posted by scooterscot View Post

Was that the 16-17 years debate? Watched it too. Such a large audience.

The debate is over. It occurred over the last two years. A comprehensive white paper was produced by one side, nothing by the other.

The number of people registering to vote who have never done so before is much more interesting.

97% isn't it? Still lets see if that translates to votes cast it'd be great if it did, but like I've said previously if it's a close run thing there are going to be plenty of people that are p****d off that it didn't go their way.
Leave a comment:
scooterscot replied

12 September 2014, 07:19
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post

I watched another debate on the Scots referendum tonight.
More cheap political point scoring and narrow minded thinking

this great event is lacking a statesman. Above self interest, speaking for the benefit of all.
Its just lacking

The people involved in leading this are just no-marks. one and all

Was that the 16-17 years debate? Watched it too. Such a large audience.

The debate is over. It occurred over the last two years. A comprehensive white paper was produced by one side, nothing by the other.

The number of people registering to vote who have never done so before is much more interesting.
Leave a comment:
The Spartan replied

12 September 2014, 07:10
Originally posted by centurian View Post

And if they think it's bad now - wait until they vote yes - that's when the gloves will really come off.

Fingers crossed I'm still hoping that they vote yes, so we can see the ensuing chaos
Leave a comment:
centurian replied

12 September 2014, 06:40
And if they think it's bad now - wait until they vote yes - that's when the gloves will really come off.
Leave a comment:
EternalOptimist started a topic Did they expect us to treat them with any respect ?

11 September 2014, 22:41
Did they expect us to treat them with any respect ?

I watched another debate on the Scots referendum tonight.
More cheap political point scoring and narrow minded thinking

this great event is lacking a statesman. Above self interest, speaking for the benefit of all.
Its just lacking

The people involved in leading this are just no-marks. one and all
Tags: None