• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "telephone Interview"

Collapse

  • Flubster
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    Those who get a lot more than they are clearly worth would not want such an amount to be published because it would endanger their earnings.

    They also don't want it to be known because they operate on a non-fixed price basis - basically rip off the inexperienced and have smaller margins with those who experienced, if they start publishing it then prices will average out and this would change their model dramatically.
    A factual statement, but it is not clear whether or not you would support this. I for one do not see an issue with this. Again, it enforces the fact that newbies get 'ripped off' (and fairly due to risk management) and that old hats will negotiate in an informed manner.

    Come on @gents, let's have a bit of transparency here. We all know what's going on...we know you're here...so let's dance.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Flubster
    Why should it be a big secret who takes what cut?
    Those who get a lot more than they are clearly worth would not want such an amount to be published because it would endanger their earnings.

    They also don't want it to be known because they operate on a non-fixed price basis - basically rip off the inexperienced and have smaller margins with those who experienced, if they start publishing it then prices will average out and this would change their model dramatically.

    Leave a comment:


  • teabag
    replied
    Originally posted by Flubster
    Why should it be a big secret who takes what cut? When a Financial Advisor sells you some form of policy, it is made very clear how much commission they will get paid as a result of the sale. Okay, so that business is regulated through the FSA and I'm not sure there's much mileage in regulating the recruitment business, but isn't it just being open and honest (adult?) about everyone knowing:
    a) What the client is paying
    b) What the agent's cut is
    c) What your rate is
    At the moment, the only party who is certain to know the answer to all 3 is the agent.

    Or am I missing something here...?
    Exactly, the client is paying and the contractor is doing the ahem...work. SO why ever should the agent be only one in know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flubster
    replied
    Why should it be a big secret who takes what cut? When a Financial Advisor sells you some form of policy, it is made very clear how much commission they will get paid as a result of the sale. Okay, so that business is regulated through the FSA and I'm not sure there's much mileage in regulating the recruitment business, but isn't it just being open and honest (adult?) about everyone knowing:
    a) What the client is paying
    b) What the agent's cut is
    c) What your rate is
    At the moment, the only party who is certain to know the answer to all 3 is the agent.

    Or am I missing something here...?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by teabag
    True, an efficient market is essentially a subjective / qualitative as like most of economics...
    It is very much like communism.

    Leave a comment:


  • teabag
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    "Efficient market" in economics is pretty much the same as "absolute zero temp" in physics - a condition that never happens, but it is often used to compare how far things from it.
    True, an efficient market is essentially a subjective / qualitative as like most of economics...

    Leave a comment:


  • Nipple Clamp
    replied
    Originally posted by AtW
    "Efficient market" in economics is pretty much the same as "absolute zero temp" in physics - a condition that never happens, but it is often used to compare how far things from it.
    For most income ranges an efficient market is arguably more like a Maxwell temperature distribution.

    See We're all just atoms in a gas

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    Never happened, but my answer would be "The price is for me to offer, not an agent". Letting other people tell you how much you should be charging is the road to perdition.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    "Efficient market" in economics is pretty much the same as "absolute zero temp" in physics - a condition that never happens, but it is often used to compare how far things from it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phoenix
    replied
    Originally posted by expat
    Good point. Efficient market.

    Yeah! Then you wake up and realise you were dreaming!

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by teabag
    Hell yes tell I'd tell emm..If there was perfect disclosure about the margins then the marketplace would be fairer and more efficient...

    In fact I'd go so far as to ask the client myself. Imperfect knowledge does neither the client or candidate any good !!
    Good point. Efficient market.

    Leave a comment:


  • teabag
    replied
    Originally posted by Asterix
    Did you tell him the truth ? All I'd say is that 'I were told not to divulge this' or maybe 'Rate is negotiable pending the outcome of the interview' . How did it go otherwise ?
    Hell yes tell I'd tell emm..If there was perfect disclosure about the margins then the marketplace would be fairer and more efficient...

    In fact I'd go so far as to ask the client myself. Imperfect knowledge does neither the client or candidate any good !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Asterix
    replied
    So...

    Did you tell him the truth ? All I'd say is that 'I were told not to divulge this' or maybe 'Rate is negotiable pending the outcome of the interview' . How did it go otherwise ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Phoenix
    replied
    Just seemed a strange question....maybe the client not trusting the pimp?

    Leave a comment:


  • janey
    replied
    wouldn't they easily be able to find this out by simply searching on jobserve etc?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X