• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Anyone here security cleared?"

Collapse

  • XLMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucifer Box
    wile
    you is obviously from up nort wair dey don't ave any aitc(h)es

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by XLMonkey
    this is because the agent is fick. under EU trade rules no public body is allowed to place unreasonable constraints on who can provide services, and that includes security clearance. They are only allowed to reject you if you fail the security check. Not having been checked isn't allowed as a reason for rejection.

    you can have some fun pointing this out to the agent and listening to the deadening pause at the end of the line when they realise that you know more about their business than they do.....

    not that it's going to get you the job, but at least it'll while away another lazy afternoon
    wile

    Leave a comment:


  • XLMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by Boolean
    I have seen many adverts on Jobsite/jobserve that state this.
    this is because the agent is fick. under EU trade rules no public body is allowed to place unreasonable constraints on who can provide services, and that includes security clearance. They are only allowed to reject you if you fail the security check. Not having been checked isn't allowed as a reason for rejection.

    you can have some fun pointing this out to the agent and listening to the deadening pause at the end of the line when they realise that you know more about their business than they do.....

    not that it's going to get you the job, but at least it'll while away another lazy afternoon

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore
    Interesting MoD projects? I think not...

    It was actually. We implemented the FIRST DoD to MoD link in the world

    Leave a comment:


  • Boolean
    replied
    By law, no contract should be advertised that states security clearance as a pre-requisite (it constitutes a breach of EU trade law). However, it is lawful to state that candidates must be willing to undergo clearance if they are accepted. You might want to remember this if the agent says "must be security cleared" on the advert. They are wrong.
    I have seen many adverts on Jobsite/jobserve that state this.


    4) Contacts, dear boy, contacts
    oh dear. Well thats another avenue closed for me then. I guess it doesn't help being Billy NoMates.

    Leave a comment:


  • XLMonkey
    replied
    1) SC

    2), 3) see the DVA link here

    http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/Ab...onsultants.htm

    4) Contacts, dear boy, contacts

    5) By law, no contract should be advertised that states security clearance as a pre-requisite (it constitutes a breach of EU trade law). However, it is lawful to state that candidates must be willing to undergo clearance if they are accepted. You might want to remember this if the agent says "must be security cleared" on the advert. They are wrong.

    ... but in practical terms, it does help to have clearance, as the client has less paperwork to deal with. The only problem being, you have to have a sponsor to get the clearance, and you have to have the job to get the sponsor. Another wonderful catch 22 situation.

    6) Central government


    7) oh yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMonkey
    I worked for the MoD on some "interesting" projects but did not have official security clearance. I signed the OSA and got briefed but that was it?!?
    Interesting MoD projects? I think not...

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied
    I worked for the MoD on some "interesting" projects but did not have official security clearance. I signed the OSA and got briefed but that was it?!?

    Leave a comment:


  • AttitudeAdjuster
    replied
    Time to take depends very much on the level.

    SC I think can be done in a few weeks, DV on the other hand will take 6 months! (I know cos it took that time for me and another person who went for the gig at the same time - so it seems to be independent of the person, well maybe).

    Leave a comment:


  • Epiphone
    replied
    Not yet but going through it for the Police

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Too many questions.

    You cant get clearance yourself, you have to go through a sponsoring agency which is usualy part of the employers business.
    It is difficult/expensive to become a sponsor ISTR.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boolean
    started a topic Anyone here security cleared?

    Anyone here security cleared?

    Security cleared so y ou are ablt to work in the the public sector.

    If so, a few questions

    1)Upto what level?

    2)Did you pay for it yourself, or did an agency?

    3)How long did it take?

    4)How did you manage to find contracts in the public sector? Where they in IT?

    5)Is there an advantage to getting security cleared first, and then applying for Public sector jobs?

    6)Was this for central government or local?

    7)Am I asking too many questions?

    Please advise,

    Many thanks,
    Last edited by Boolean; 22 May 2006, 15:43.

Working...
X