Go for it Psycho. Maybe offer to do it after work hours ? Around 12 midnight when a server downtime is not noticeable.
But I would love to hear back on how it went.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Doing 'other' work for client
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Doing 'other' work for client"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Harmonic View PostCool, just thought of one more thing. Sometimes older boxes need a firmware upgrade to support larger Dimms. Manufacturers always say you should be running the latest firmware but it's worth checking as a firmware upgrade is far more likely to stuff everything than a RAM upgrade.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View Post3rd party. Already checked - customer serviceable parts are ok.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harmonic View PostWho's providing the maintenance on the V440s? It's worth checking if it's Oracle or a third party. When Oracle borged Sun they hiked support costs and so lots of companies moved to third party support. If they are on Oracle support then you should be OK to replace customer serviceable parts but if they are on third-party support then you'll need to check the T&Cs as there's nothing to stop them putting in a clause that all upgrades must be carried out by their engineers.
Leave a comment:
-
Who's providing the maintenance on the V440s? It's worth checking if it's Oracle or a third party. When Oracle borged Sun they hiked support costs and so lots of companies moved to third party support. If they are on Oracle support then you should be OK to replace customer serviceable parts but if they are on third-party support then you'll need to check the T&Cs as there's nothing to stop them putting in a clause that all upgrades must be carried out by their engineers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostTrue enough. But theres always a risk whoever fits them no matter how small.....
If Oracle mess up a machine, then there's a high chance that they might have other people and / or parts that can help put things right. If you mess up the machine, what can you provide to get it right?
That's why people go to the manufacturer for things - they want one big person that they can blame, knowing that they have the support team to help if things go wrong.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostNo I don't but then in my spanner wielding days I was qualified to work on Sun Enterprise Kit (e10K , e25K) so messing about with a few little servers wouldn't worry me....
But I would say is the biggest risks for doing this sort of stuff is:
a) Other stuff fails.
b) The new Dimms fail on fit.
c) You damage them with static discharge while fitting.
d) You damage the motherboard while fitting.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostIf it's user serviceable why aren't the client doing it themselves? They must have made a risk calculation to get someone in.
You ask'd our opinion, the mass consensus is don't do it, but that's only our opinion.
Leave a comment:
-
If it's user serviceable why aren't the client doing it themselves? They must have made a risk calculation to get someone in.
You ask'd our opinion, the mass consensus is don't do it, but that's only our opinion.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostSurely, if you follow this argument then you'd never touch anything. Do you take your own PC somewhere to have RAM fitted just in case?
But I would say is the biggest risks for doing this sort of stuff is:
a) Other stuff fails.
b) The new Dimms fail on fit.
c) You damage them with static discharge while fitting.
d) You damage the motherboard while fitting.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostBut if I fit the part myself, provided by same company who provide the support, then theres no reason, assuming they are happy and I follow procedures, that they wont be available if things go wrong.
Surely, if you follow this argument then you'd never touch anything. Do you take your own PC somewhere to have RAM fitted just in case?
Dont get me wrong, I wouldnt attempt anything I wasnt covered for. But its a bit like saying I dont want to risk putting oil in my car myself just in case it goes wrong. There are things that are meant to be done yourself and things which you need in depth knowledge to do.
On a similar note, engineer turned up here this morning to replace a CPU fan on a similar server. I declined to do this myself since it was flagged as an engineer part. Young fella turned (about 20yrs old tops!), admitted he'd never even had the lid off one of these servers (they are quite old) and admitted he'd had to look at manual to see how to do it. Not saying if he knackered it there wouldnt be a company backing him to come and fix it but thats my point.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bobspud View PostThats why you are a suport monkey
+1 for the "Stay away and leave the work for someone that has a dedicated parts bin or callout to replace other things that might break." approach.
Surely, if you follow this argument then you'd never touch anything. Do you take your own PC somewhere to have RAM fitted just in case?
Dont get me wrong, I wouldnt attempt anything I wasnt covered for. But its a bit like saying I dont want to risk putting oil in my car myself just in case it goes wrong. There are things that are meant to be done yourself and things which you need in depth knowledge to do.
On a similar note, engineer turned up here this morning to replace a CPU fan on a similar server. I declined to do this myself since it was flagged as an engineer part. Young fella turned (about 20yrs old tops!), admitted he'd never even had the lid off one of these servers (they are quite old) and admitted he'd had to look at manual to see how to do it. Not saying if he knackered it there wouldnt be a company backing him to come and fix it but thats my point.Last edited by psychocandy; 7 February 2012, 14:17.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostDid you miss this comment??
Just the whole attitude to risk here is also an issue let alone being skilled enough to do it properly.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Harmonic View PostAssuming this is an x86 box then as long as ClientCo are using parts from the original manufacturer then the server warranty will cover the upgraded parts.
If it's a SPARC or Power box then walk away now.
One word of warning, back when I worked for a big blue server vendor I went in to do a quick RAM upgrade on the mail server for a national paper. The new Dimms blew the memory board and we had to pull a lot of strings to get a new one on the same day. It's worth checking what response time ClientCo have on their warranty and if they have weekend cover.
They're also the ones providing the maintenance contract from day to day. I guess it might be wise to check that no warranty is being invalidated if I do this. I suspect the fact that the parts are labelled as USER SERVICEABLE would mean not.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostThis is hardly a professional attitude towards your clients business.
I am sure there are a shed load of hardward guys banging their heads on tables right now.
Maybe I should have added this is listed as a user-serviceable part by Oracle. Its a memory sim upgrade. The user serviceable bit is important.
I recently declined to do a hardware fix on another machine because, even though it was easy, it was listed as a engineer fitted part.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Today 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Yesterday 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
Leave a comment: