HMRC Contracting
I saw this article a few months ago, made me laugh, think the times or daily mail made quite a bit out of story (the pay as opposed to IR35)
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Bringing Hector Down From The Inside
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Bringing Hector Down From The Inside"
Collapse
-
Its ok, I'll pretend the contract works like the rep system so I'll just sign off the contract MFOriginally posted by MarillionFan View PostRight. A gig at HMRC. That's like a girl scout going round to Paul Gadds house offering to do some cleaning.
Steer well clear.
Leave a comment:
-
Right. A gig at HMRC. That's like a girl scout going round to Paul Gadds house offering to do some cleaning.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostJust got off the phone about a gig at HMRC in Newcastle, all pretty standard except they mentioned a "project specific clearance", I advised them I am fully SC, in date and active but they said this is required.
Anyone got any info on what to expect? As so far things are "feeling iffy" as they seemed to spend more time on explaining the clearance side than the actual work.
Steer well clear.
Leave a comment:
-
HMRC should be investigated regarding its current use of contractors. If any of them are found to be under the supervision of HMRC personnel, then HMRC is IR35-caught and will have to pay itself a massive fine.Originally posted by Wanderer View PostI guess this is one of the few occasions when you would actually ask HMRC to review your contract and proposed working conditions and give you an opinion regarding IR35. If they say it's IR35 caught then ask for a 40% increase to cover that.
Leave a comment:
-
That's class ! Great shout...Originally posted by Wanderer View PostI guess this is one of the few occasions when you would actually ask HMRC to review your contract and proposed working conditions and give you an opinion regarding IR35. If they say it's IR35 caught then ask for a 40% increase to cover that.
Leave a comment:
-
I guess this is one of the few occasions when you would actually ask HMRC to review your contract and proposed working conditions and give you an opinion regarding IR35. If they say it's IR35 caught then ask for a 40% increase to cover that.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostJust got off the phone about a gig at HMRC in Newcastle
Leave a comment:
-
If HMRC doesn't approve of contractors, they should try running their systems without them and see how they get on.Originally posted by TestMangler View PostHector - No your honour, he was just like any other employee. He used our computers, he ate in our canteen, he slept in our bogs, filled in the holiday spreadsheet and did what he was told. in fact your honour, I would go as far as to say, he licked the same chutney spoon as all of our employees
Leave a comment:
-
You could ask the manager if he wouldn't mind paying you by cash to help with accounting difficulties. Offer to split the VAT with him if he gives no-receipt cash.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWould you suggest cutting ones losses and going brolly for the duration of the contract or can I just pay myself the full whack as a salary through my Ltd
Leave a comment:
-
Absolutely not mate. I'm just teasing really.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWould you suggest cutting ones losses and going brolly for the duration of the contract?!
I do seem to remember though, that there was a case a few years ago of a contractor working for EDS on an HMRC contract lost an IR35 case on client evidence from EDS. I'll need to see if I can find it.
Ask them at interview if they know what IR35 is ?
Leave a comment:
-
Would you suggest cutting ones losses and going brolly for the duration of the contract or can I just pay myself the full whack as a salary through my Ltd
Leave a comment:
-
Dear boy, it's the working practices, not the contract.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostIf it gets that far I am certainly gonna make sure the contract is IR35 proof
Simon Mac - Your honour, I was a completely autonomous contractor, working without the direction and control of the end client, with no obligation to accept or carry out work outside our contractual arrangements.
Hector - No your honour, he was just like any other employee. He used our computers, he ate in our canteen, he slept in our bogs, filled in the holiday spreadsheet and did what he was told. in fact your honour, I would go as far as to say, he licked the same chutney spoon as all of our employees
Leave a comment:
-
If it gets that far I am certainly gonna make sure the contract is IR35 proof
Leave a comment:
-
Don't fall for this obvious double bluff.Originally posted by SimonMac View PostJust got off the phone about a gig at HMRC in Newcastle, all pretty standard except they mentioned a "project specific clearance", I advised them I am fully SC, in date and active but they said this is required.
Anyone got any info on what to expect? As so far things are "feeling iffy" as they seemed to spend more time on explaining the clearance side than the actual work.
They will get you in, IR35 investigate you and then present their own 'client evidence' to the tribunal. And then you'll beef hooked.
Leave a comment:
-
Bringing Hector Down From The Inside
Just got off the phone about a gig at HMRC in Newcastle, all pretty standard except they mentioned a "project specific clearance", I advised them I am fully SC, in date and active but they said this is required.
Anyone got any info on what to expect? As so far things are "feeling iffy" as they seemed to spend more time on explaining the clearance side than the actual work.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Leave a comment: