• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "SAP Config .... IBM V's Axxon ?"

Collapse

  • eternalnomad
    replied
    I have worked through both.

    In principle it depends on the scope and scale of the implementation.

    For truly global projects of an enormous scale i would suggested IBM (i.e. ex PWC) to be the company of choice.

    For anything less than mega-implementation the I would recommend Axxon

    Leave a comment:


  • Cowboy Bob
    replied
    Originally posted by Contractor
    Who in your opinion is the best config team for a new implementation?
    Noone as I wouldn't be installing that bloated heap of carp in the firstplace.

    Leave a comment:


  • Contractor
    started a topic SAP Config .... IBM V's Axxon ?

    SAP Config .... IBM V's Axxon ?

    Who in your opinion is the best config team for a new implementation?

Working...
X