This sounds too similar to a 419 demand. I would be sceptical.
Check this out www.419eater.com
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Better to be pragmatic?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Better to be pragmatic?"
Collapse
-
I am normally pretty easy about these things, but I drew the line when a certain pimp wanted:
2 references from where i last worked - hmmm ok..
1 personal refernce - wtf...
Utility bills - hmmmm ok...but getting peeved
driving license - hmmmm..
passport scanned - no F.O
NI - hmmm ok...
he wanted all of these things before putting me forward, I told him to stick it...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by norrahe View PostSome of us are in the financial position of having contracted for quite a while and can pick and chose our gigs.
No need to be so rude or agressive.
I think I raised a legitimate point but hey lets not upset the apple cart here .......
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25 View PostSo hows that tactic of sticking to your guns working out for you then?
No need to be so rude or agressive.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25 View PostSo hows that tactic of sticking to your guns working out for you then?
to be fair I've not been looking for a large part that and the war chest will last many years yet so I'm not fussed.
like i said it's all about circumstances - i don't need to flex on those points so i don't - others will be working within different paramters and that's fair enough
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by HeadOfTesting View PostBut there are other things which I won't flex on, even in my 15th month on the bench
So hows that tactic of sticking to your guns working out for you then?
Leave a comment:
-
I think it's sensible to continually reflect on whether you're striking the right balance.
For me there are things which I've always done but which some people refuse to do such as:
- accepting linkedin invites from agents
- attending pre-interviews at the agent's office
and so I don't need to change there.
But there are other things which I won't flex on, even in my 15th month on the bench such as:
- allowing my CV to go forward where I don't know who the client is
- giving 2 references up front
That said there are areas where I'm being a bit more flexible, most notably on CV tweaks. Since I've always applied for roles on the presumption that the job doesn't exist, I've never felt able to justify the effort of tailoring my CV to specific opportunities. Fundamentally I'm sticking with that policy but if an agent suggests specific changes based on insights they can provide then if I am satisfied that the role is real I'm willing to look at making those edits.
As ever it all comes down to your own personal circumstances.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wanderer View PostYou might have to change your forum name then!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostIn these challenging market conditions, is it better to be pragmatic rather than stand one's ground?
I mean jobs are few and far between with opportunities for interview seemingly even fewer.
So normally when agents ask for things like NI Number, low rate range, emphasise particular skills on your cv for the role etc etc, I normally say no can do.
But, there's a good chance if you dont do this now you'll miss the opportunity at hand, isnt there? OK some, probably most, are phishing trips but, its not worth being obstinate and missing out!?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostIn these challenging market conditions, is it better to be pragmatic rather than stand one's ground?
I mean jobs are few and far between with opportunities for interview seemingly even fewer.
So normally when agents ask for things like NI Number, low rate range, emphasise particular skills on your cv for the role etc etc, I normally say no can do.
But, there's a good chance if you dont do this now you'll miss the opportunity at hand, isnt there? OK some, probably most, are phishing trips but, its not worth being obstinate and missing out!?
Leave a comment:
-
Better to be pragmatic?
In these challenging market conditions, is it better to be pragmatic rather than stand one's ground?
I mean jobs are few and far between with opportunities for interview seemingly even fewer.
So normally when agents ask for things like NI Number, low rate range, emphasise particular skills on your cv for the role etc etc, I normally say no can do.
But, there's a good chance if you dont do this now you'll miss the opportunity at hand, isnt there? OK some, probably most, are phishing trips but, its not worth being obstinate and missing out!?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Today 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Yesterday 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Yesterday 05:45
- Payment request to bust recruitment agency — free template Sep 16 21:04
- Why licensing umbrella companies must be key to 2027’s regulation Sep 16 13:55
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 15 03:46
- Top 5 Chapter 11 JSL myths contractors should know Sep 14 15:46
- What the housing market needs at Autumn Budget 2025 Sep 10 20:58
- Qdos hit by cybersecurity ‘attack’ Sep 10 01:01
- Why party conference season 2025 is a self-employment policy litmus test Sep 9 09:53
Leave a comment: