Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Ok, so it is more like Senior VP role rather than a developer
In investment banks it is quite normal for some developers to have the role "Senior VP". Believe me there are many more roles above that one. In the last bank I worked for being a "VP" meant you were a Junior programmer, most senior level developers were "Senior VP". The odd one or two was a "Director".
Originally posted by NeverBeenNorthOfTheM25View Post
Greenfield is my favourite kind of work, none of the carp that comes with having to retrofit stuff.
Just the name Greenfield conjures up images of grass ..... cows ..... blue skies ...... its all very relaxing.
Greenfield work is great and it doesn't come around very often. But like I said, they often give it to contractors because the permies know the legacy systems.
I'd rather have £350 a day contract than £67K perm.
I hope the OP will tell us how much he is enjoying working late, working weekends, 360 appraisals, PDPs, office politics, endless corporate bulltulipe, and (best of all ) working on legacy systems while they give all the greenfield work to the contractors.
I think there's some confusion here - the rough eqivalent permie salary is said to be 1000 x hourly rate. Assuming an 8 hour day the £550 leads to £68.75/hr -> £68,750 pa. But as was stated earlier if this is caught by IR35 then the daily rate needs to be reduced to take account of the extra employers national insurance.
This calculation is only a rough guide though. And it's not all about the money...
Yes, there seems to be.
The other chap suggested the formula gave an equivalent salary of 55k. Applying the formula in reverse gives an hourly rate of £55, which imples one is working 10hrs a day for ones £550.
You might also try:
day rate * 111 = equivalent permie salary
day rate * 55 = market rate permie salary for the same job
I think you're trying to put people off. No way I'm working 10 hours a day!
I think there's some confusion here - the rough eqivalent permie salary is said to be 1000 x hourly rate. Assuming an 8 hour day the £550 leads to £68.75/hr -> £68,750 pa. But as was stated earlier if this is caught by IR35 then the daily rate needs to be reduced to take account of the extra employers national insurance.
This calculation is only a rough guide though. And it's not all about the money...
DocP: Your trying to put everybody else off contracting so that you get a higher rate. Not going to work. No way on earth that 550pd = 55k perm salary by ur x1000 calculation.
I think you're trying to put people off. No way I'm working 10 hours a day!
DocP: Your trying to put everybody else off contracting so that you get a higher rate. Not going to work. No way on earth that 550pd = 55k perm salary by ur x1000 calculation.
Leave a comment: