Ok - I suppose if you look at it like that - I looked at the role
and automatically took databases,c#,vb,2008 - the whole thing as a given and
imo £25 per hour......forget it.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Two Words ?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Two Words ?"
Collapse
-
Yes £20-25/h for just ASP.NET isn't historically bad. No database knowledge required. No middleware or messaging. Not even any preference for VB or C#. No specific industry knowledge either.
Leave a comment:
-
Honestly, while £15 would be low end (but not outrageous) £20 to £25 has been about average for a bog standard web dev outside of finance for a long while now (even well before the crash).
Web dev market never really recovered from the 2001 crash due to a combination of outsourcing and all the Uni's still churning out new media/web devs like they were going out of style (someone needs to tell Uni's the DotCom Boom is over). Anyone who has not got out of that sector or become high end specialised (Security is best one) should have become accustomed to crap rates a long time ago
If you know anyone thinking of going into that area tell them to forget it (unless you dislike them), they will be at pay rate level of helpdesk jockeys before too long
Used to mean video/audio and sometimes graphic work but now it's a stupid catch all term that means whatever the particular company wants it to mean, basiclly the new "Web 2.0"Originally posted by RichardCranium View PostWTF does digital mean now?Last edited by Not So Wise; 31 July 2009, 13:48.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
It says "Digital experience desirable". I thought I knew what 'digital' meant.
I keep seing "Digital Project Manager" roles and "Digital systems experience".
WTF does digital mean now?
Leave a comment:
-
I think i'm doing something extremely wrong, I need to get out of the support environment and move on to something better paying because i would be quite happy with £25p/h
Leave a comment:
-
Two Words ?
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


Leave a comment: