Originally posted by Wilmslow
View Post
Here's the test. Irrespective of your Ltd's name, does your personal name appear on the contract anywhere? (Hint: It's usually near the beginning where terms are defined naming you, personally, as "the consultant"). If so, your "right of substitution" is almost certainly a sham. In this case, you'll almost certainly also find a clause that stipulates that the "contractor" (i.e. your Ltd.) may supply services via a different "consultant" but that the client has the right to reject the supplied "consultant" if they don't meet some arbitrary (and very frequently undefined) conditions entirely imposed and controlled by the client. This is the reason very few people have actually substituted as approx. 99% of all contracts are like this.
You'll know you've got a "real" right of substitution if the only name that appears on the contract is that of your Ltd. and your personal name is not mentioned at all (save for your name next to the place to sign as a representative of your Ltd.) and there's no further clauses restricting the "contractor's" ability to supply services to the client via any means they so choose.
Having a sham RoS doesn't mean you can't do it, of course, but you need a client who is amenable to having a different person physically show up on their site to perform the work. Again, given that 99% of clients view contractors as "temporary permies", you're highly likely to meet with a lot of resistance (this is why they interview you for the gig, not you as a representative of your Ltd). Still, if you want to have a go, you simply speak to the client and inform them that you'd like to send along a different "consultant" for the next 4 months of the gig. Be fully prepared, though, for the client to immediately retort with, "No." which you'll simply have to accept (and thereby showing up the RoS clause for the sham it is).
What does your contract say?
Leave a comment: