Thanks for the info everyone, i think the point by gonzo (also seen at other sites)
"the control that your client exercises over what you do"
is the key factor here. I am happy to say the client does have limit control over the work i do. I am given my requirement/design spec and it is left to me how i actually implement it. The client has very little or no say on this. (well that is what they are paying me for)
thanks again
Asif
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Possible IR35 cLAUSE
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Possible IR35 cLAUSE"
Collapse
-
There are a number of factors to take into account that determine whether HMRC will think that you are a "disguised employee" - but the control that your client exercises over what you do seems to be key here.Originally posted by akhtara7Is that even the case where 37.5 are the minimum, over the last 6 -7 months i have worked far more hours and not been paid for the extra hrs. As i have agreed to do a piece of work and if it takes more then the standard 37.5 hrs then i would be expected to make the time up myself.
If your contract is to supply a specific piece of work then I don't think that there is any need for the number of hours that you will attend to be in the contract.
I don't have any experience of an IR35 investigation though so it would be useful if someone that did could add to this post!
Leave a comment:
-
Is that even the case where 37.5 are the minimum, over the last 6 -7 months i have worked far more hours and not been paid for the extra hrs. As i have agreed to do a piece of work and if it takes more then the standard 37.5 hrs then i would be expected to make the time up myself.
Leave a comment:
-
Gonzo is correct. In an IR35 investigation the inspector will look at what actually happens on the ground, not what the contract says. If you effectively just turn up for 37.5 hours a week and do whatever your told to do, your position is weak regardless of any fancy contract clauses.
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like that in practice your client does have control over the hours you attend which, I believe, is what HMRC will want to consider in an IR35 investigation regardless of what the contract says.Originally posted by akhtara7In real lfe the client does allow me to come in anytime between 8 - 9.30 as long as i do the 37.5 hrs per week (The 37.5 hrs are listed in the contract)
Thanks in advance
Asif
Leave a comment:
-
Possible IR35 cLAUSE
I have a contract which is outside of IR35 but recently a new clause/condition has been added
"attendance hours: as per clients instruction"
This to me seems like the client has control over the hours i work, making it less IR35 friendly.
Is their anyway i could reword it to make it more IR35 friendly.
In real lfe the client does allow me to come in anytime between 8 - 9.30 as long as i do the 37.5 hrs per week (The 37.5 hrs are listed in the contract)
Thanks in advance
AsifLast edited by Contractor UK; 7 October 2011, 12:43.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Leave a comment: