I think they'd struggle to justify a retro rate cut either ethically or under contract.*
* Unless it is one of our brands, in which case pay the money back.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Contract Agency Rate advice.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contract Agency Rate advice."
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jmo21 View PostSurely a mistake is when they say "The rate is now £400/day", then the contract comes through, and it says eg £425, and you knowingly don't tell them.
Retrospectively back dating a rate cut further, when that new figure was never mentioned to you can't possibly be enforceable can it?
He wasn't sure whether he wanted to stay, but I pointed out he had them by the nuts and he quite happily renewed for £150 extra p/d. They're almost certainty losing money on him but that's the price they pay for screwing up.
It's not their god given right to make a profit and it's their own problem if they failed to push a rate reduction on to you. They can only do this going forward where you have the ability to say "no thanks" and leave.
Leave a comment:
-
Surely a mistake is when they say "The rate is now £400/day", then the contract comes through, and it says eg £425, and you knowingly don't tell them.
Retrospectively back dating a rate cut further, when that new figure was never mentioned to you can't possibly be enforceable can it?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pr1 View Postafter they've signed the contract and have been paying the agreed amount for 3 months? no chance
Kick-em tulipless.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostI know a certain agency who shall rename nameless who would do this sort of thing if they could get away with it.
Did the classic day before start to one guy (not me!) i.e. sorry client hasn't got the budget so they've cut the rate by £50. Of course, client had done no such thing and agent pocketed the difference. All came out, client was not pleased that agent had lied and falsely represented them but agent still managed to blag his way out and keep the business.
Large company with signed agreements/loads of contractors on site - seems agents know it takes a fair bit to get kicked out totally. One dodgy deal with one contractor isnt going to kill it.
Also, one agent pulls this sort of thing, make a few thousand for the agency and hes agent of the week (and he thinks hes bertie big bollox). If it goes wrong, agency just blame rogue agent.....
In the the case I saw, client was REALLY stupid and naive, and agent was completely full of tulipe and seemed able and confident in his ability to talk his way out of anything if it went wrong.... Probably made loads of money
And i'd tell the agency in question to sling it for the case in question.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SlipTheJab View PostYes.
Sound like they've cocked up and are out of pocket, their mistake so tough, that's life.
Did the classic day before start to one guy (not me!) i.e. sorry client hasn't got the budget so they've cut the rate by £50. Of course, client had done no such thing and agent pocketed the difference. All came out, client was not pleased that agent had lied and falsely represented them but agent still managed to blag his way out and keep the business.
Large company with signed agreements/loads of contractors on site - seems agents know it takes a fair bit to get kicked out totally. One dodgy deal with one contractor isnt going to kill it.
Also, one agent pulls this sort of thing, make a few thousand for the agency and hes agent of the week (and he thinks hes bertie big bollox). If it goes wrong, agency just blame rogue agent.....
In the the case I saw, client was REALLY stupid and naive, and agent was completely full of tulipe and seemed able and confident in his ability to talk his way out of anything if it went wrong.... Probably made loads of money
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostAh right. So when they under pay you, you dont have any recourse to the money owed? I'll let you continue to believe that one.
Very much doubt the 'concensus' that's built up here. An error is an error and if they can show its an error, it will have to be paid back in full.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostAm I the only one to think this might be the agency trying it on?
Example. Client pays agency £500/day for 6 month contract. Contractor gets £450/day. Hes happy works 3 months of the 6.
Agency sends this letter. Oops sorry it should have been £400 per day. Please can we have our money back and it'll be £400 going forward.
Instantly, makes 60 days x £50 = £3000. Then another £3000 in the next three months.
Bait and switch. Entice contractor in with nice high rate then claw it back saying its a mistake.
Personally, unless it was a really obvious mistake (like £2000 a day instead of £200) I'd be saying sorry.....
Sound like they've cocked up and are out of pocket, their mistake so tough, that's life.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostAh right. So when they under pay you, you dont have any recourse to the money owed? I'll let you continue to believe that one.
Very much doubt the 'concensus' that's built up here. An error is an error and if they can show its an error, it will have to be paid back in full.
Leave a comment:
-
And really is an agency ever going to say "sorry we worked it out wrong, we're taking a massive margin, more than we normally would - tell you what heres the extra £50 a day and we'll backdate it". Never in a million years.
Leave a comment:
-
Am I the only one to think this might be the agency trying it on?
Example. Client pays agency £500/day for 6 month contract. Contractor gets £450/day. Hes happy works 3 months of the 6.
Agency sends this letter. Oops sorry it should have been £400 per day. Please can we have our money back and it'll be £400 going forward.
Instantly, makes 60 days x £50 = £3000. Then another £3000 in the next three months.
Bait and switch. Entice contractor in with nice high rate then claw it back saying its a mistake.
Personally, unless it was a really obvious mistake (like £2000 a day instead of £200) I'd be saying sorry.....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BolshieBastard View PostAh right. So when they under pay you, you dont have any recourse to the money owed? I'll let you continue to believe that one.
Very much doubt the 'concensus' that's built up here. An error is an error and if they can show its an error, it will have to be paid back in full.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GJABS View PostClauses about errors and omissions usually only apply to unimportant issues/spelling errors - that sort of thing. I very much doubt a court would regard a mistake in something as important as the rate of pay to be something that can be retrospectively changed*
I assume what is in the contract was consistent with what was initially agreed verbally?
*Only the government can do that sort of thing. And they do!
Very much doubt the 'concensus' that's built up here. An error is an error and if they can show its an error, it will have to be paid back in full.
Leave a comment:
-
Have you got access to a legal helpline? If so, give them a call.
But agree with the consensus - unless your contract allows for it, tell 'em to poke it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: