I've had a similar issue, where I'm working on two projects for one client, the tasks are doled out frequently as the priorities etc change.. Advice from QDos was to essentially get them in general terms into a statement of work at the start of the month and get it signed off as being what will be worked on for the next month's invoice.
So I have "UAT Support" as an item, this covers fixing any tasks that come out of the user testing phase of the project.
I have "analysis and design product x" which may cover me writing 3-4 tech specs during the month.
At the end of the month the invoice has a line for each item breaking down the cost per item.
Of course everyone knows in the real world, especially in IT priorities change etc.. As long as you have something to show roughly what your going to be doing you should be ok..
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Other department interested, but SDC nightmare"
Collapse
-
If there's an end deliverable (e.g project, product, service provision implementation) then get that into your contract and that an agile approach is being taken so tasks are subject to revision on a weekly basis or some such.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NibblyPig View PostI was hired to complete a specific project, no agile environment, I was told on day one which features I had to complete, and then was left to my own devices to complete them. While I was stuck waiting for information from 3rd parties, I spent time clearing out a backlog of bugs in TFS. No supervision, no direction, no control.
But the new department just need more manpower, performing whatever tasks are required by the business (direction) in whatever order they deem fit at the time (control). An exact quote was 'we need more permies but it is easier to get contractors'
Unless I am misunderstanding SDC?
Leave a comment:
-
I was hired to complete a specific project, no agile environment, I was told on day one which features I had to complete, and then was left to my own devices to complete them. While I was stuck waiting for information from 3rd parties, I spent time clearing out a backlog of bugs in TFS. No supervision, no direction, no control.
But the new department just need more manpower, performing whatever tasks are required by the business (direction) in whatever order they deem fit at the time (control). An exact quote was 'we need more permies but it is easier to get contractors'
Unless I am misunderstanding SDC?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by NibblyPig View PostDone a two months work for this huge corporation, one month then an extension. No SDC whatsoever, project was clearly defined, my work was well defined, completely left alone to do it other than a weekly progress report to check everything is on schedule. Coming to an end now as they're ready to go live.
Other dept is interested, spoke to them, and it's an IR35 red flag - they 'need more people' and tasks will be 'day to day tasks' and 'some new projects as they appear here and there' and also 'mentoring some of the junior members of the team'.
Better to explain why I'm declining (SDC) or make up some other excuse? Or is there any way to persuade them to hire me in a way that doesn't violate SDC? Thoughts on this welcome.
Leave a comment:
-
Other department interested, but SDC nightmare
Done a two months work for this huge corporation, one month then an extension. No SDC whatsoever, project was clearly defined, my work was well defined, completely left alone to do it other than a weekly progress report to check everything is on schedule. Coming to an end now as they're ready to go live.
Other dept is interested, spoke to them, and it's an IR35 red flag - they 'need more people' and tasks will be 'day to day tasks' and 'some new projects as they appear here and there' and also 'mentoring some of the junior members of the team'.
Better to explain why I'm declining (SDC) or make up some other excuse? Or is there any way to persuade them to hire me in a way that doesn't violate SDC? Thoughts on this welcome.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Today 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Yesterday 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
- Finish the song lyric Dec 12 12:05
- A quick read of the taxman’s Spotlight 67 may not be enough Dec 12 09:27
- Contractor MVL Solution from SFP Dec 11 12:53
- Gary Lineker and HMRC broker IR35 settlement on the hush Dec 11 09:10
- IT contractor jobs market sinks to four-year low in November Dec 10 09:30
- Joke of the Day Dec 9 14:57
Leave a comment: