Reply to: The Purge

[meridian]

I unlike yourself do not take things at face value. I like to know what and how the conclusion has been drawn, what assumptions have been made, etc.

I suspect that you look at my posts and think that I am defending YouGov’s accuracy. I am not.

I am pointing out that your assertion of how people voted is equally, if not more, invalid.

I’m calling you a moron not because you are challenging the accuracy of YouGov, but for your flawed methodology in what you claim to be the “real” situation and your inability to recognise it even when it is pointed out to you.

[Old Greg]

I unlike yourself do not take things at face value. I like to know what and how the conclusion has been drawn, what assumptions have been made, etc.

Unfortunately it is all beyond me, so I have to categorise it as lies.

Are you looking for us to feel sorry for you?

[Yorkie62]

According to you, a YouGov survey is flawed and inaccurate, but anecdotal evidence from you and a few mates down the local ‘Spoons is “scrutiny”

You’re a moron, no matter how big you think your brain is.

I unlike yourself do not take things at face value. I like to know what and how the conclusion has been drawn, what assumptions have been made, etc.

Brain the size of a planet and I still have to communicate with morons

[Old Greg]

You’re a moron, no matter how big you think your brain is.

This is an established CUK fact.

[meridian]

God you are a dick

According to you, a YouGov survey is flawed and inaccurate, but anecdotal evidence from you and a few mates down the local ‘Spoons is “scrutiny”

You’re a moron, no matter how big you think your brain is.

[Yorkie62]

Well that's something.

You're boring me now.

Brain the size of a planet and I still have to communicate with morons

[Old Greg]

I accept my unconditional cretinism.

Well that's something.

[Yorkie62]

....so let's leave it there.

I accept you unconditional surrender.

Brain the size of a planet and I still have to communicate with morons

[Old Greg]

I wasn't nor did I ever user the word VOTERS. I may have used the word VOTE when referring to how party members VOTED, but it was YOU not I that made the link between the word VOTE and VOTERS.

I'll try not to use big words in the future if it helps you understanding.

Voters mean people who vote. That is what you were talking about, whereas the chart was referencing party members. Looking at your post...

Something not quite right with these graphs. perhaps the sample was only taken inside the M25.

What I take from these graphs is that the labour vote migrated to the Lib dems and Greens ( Remain) whilst the conservative vote migrated to Brexit (Leave). However, in the labour heartlands of the North of England, there was a significant vote away from Labour towards the brexit Party which is why the brexit party came top in virtually every constituency. So what we have here is another southern poll all about the South East of England.

...you clearly have misunderstood. You are trying to use the Euro Election results to discredit a poll about party members, who are a very small proportion of Euro Election voters.

I guess you still don't get it so let's leave it there.

[Yorkie62]

If you're not muddling things up, why were you talking about Labour and Tory voters rather than members?

I wasn't nor did I ever user the word VOTERS. I may have used the word VOTE when referring to how party members VOTED, but it was YOU not I that made the link between the word VOTE and VOTERS.

I'll try not to use big words in the future if it helps you understanding.

[Old Greg]

Do you know what the word “scrutiny” means?

The plural of “anecdote” is not “data”.

What we do know is that Yorkie is in a strong position to retain his Cretin of the Year dunce's hat.

[Yorkie62]

Do you know what the word “scrutiny” means?

The plural of “anecdote” is not “data”.

God you are a dick

[meridian]

I'm not muddling up anything. The results just don't stack up to scrutiny.

Do you know what the word “scrutiny” means?

The plural of “anecdote” is not “data”.

[Old Greg]

I'm not muddling up anything. The results just don't stack up to scrutiny.

If you're not muddling things up, why were you talking about Labour and Tory voters rather than members?

[Yorkie62]

Do you understand now how sadly mistaken you were to muddle up voters for a party with party members?

I'm not muddling up anything. The results just don't stack up to scrutiny.