• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Article 50 - has anyone here actually read it?"

Collapse

  • tomtomagain
    replied
    Originally posted by chopper View Post
    We call many them gammons.
    It's irrelevant what you call them. I'm sure they'd have plenty of unsavoury names for you too.

    However, calling somebody stupid or racist or snowflake or gammon just because they hold a profoundly different view than your own does not make you right. It just means you are unable to reflect on their point of view.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    replied
    Originally posted by woohoo View Post
    You call the leavers racist then in the same breath call them gammons. You assume leaving the EU means no relationship, which it does not.
    Not all leavers are gammons. The gammons are the ones who envisage no relationship at all with the EU. Sever all ties.

    Leave a comment:


  • woohoo
    replied
    Originally posted by chopper View Post
    We call many them gammons.

    These are the people having wet dreams over the idea of no future relationship with the EU, therefore leaving us free to strike a Free Trade Agreement with African nations, despite them actually hating people from Africa.

    They think we'll be able to sell our goods to Africa to replace the stuff we sell to the EU.
    You call the leavers racist then in the same breath call them gammons. You assume leaving the EU means no relationship, which it does not.

    You are literally the stupidest person on this entire forum, which is saying something.

    This is very disappointing I can no longer calls Scoots the stupidest person here and I enjoy that.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    replied
    Originally posted by tomtomagain View Post
    3. There are plenty of leavers who would love it to just come to an end without agreement on 29th March.
    We call many them gammons.

    These are the people having wet dreams over the idea of no future relationship with the EU, therefore leaving us free to strike a Free Trade Agreement with African nations, despite them actually hating people from Africa.

    They think we'll be able to sell our goods to Africa to replace the stuff we sell to the EU.

    Leave a comment:


  • tomtomagain
    replied
    1. Paragraph 2. States
    taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union
    - the withdrawal agreement specifically includes the future relationship.

    2. The EU's own laws state that it must seek to build friendly, co-operative, trading relationships with neighbouring countries.

    3. There are plenty of leavers who would love it to just come to an end without agreement on 29th March.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
    Has the PM actually read it before she invoked it? It is a withdraw. A withdraw that must be complete before any new deal can be arranged.

    No. 3 is the telling one all leave voters just don't get.
    You are a bit special, aren't you?
    Ah well I suppose there must be some cretins on the Leave side too.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    started a topic Article 50 - has anyone here actually read it?

    Article 50 - has anyone here actually read it?

    Has the PM actually read it before she invoked it? It is a withdraw. A withdraw that must be complete before any new deal can be arranged.

    No. 3 is the telling one all leave voters just don't get.

    Article 50


    1. Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.

    2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.

    3. The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.

    4. For the purposes of paragraphs 2 and 3, the member of the European Council or of the Council representing the withdrawing Member State shall not participate in the discussions of the European Council or Council or in decisions concerning it.

    A qualified majority shall be defined in accordance with Article 238(3)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

    5. If a State which has withdrawn from the Union asks to rejoin, its request shall be subject to the procedure referred to in Article 49.

Working...
X