Interesting MoO readings.....

[GB9]

If I interpreted it correctly then the situation we are in now is ridiculous. How can you sign a contract to deliver a service but then argue that you are under no obligation to do so. Fine at the end of the contract, but not during.

Similarly, if you have committed resource i.e. yourself in most of our cases, to doing something, how is it reasonable to be told that you will not be getting work / pay on an ad-hoc basis at the whim of the client? Having worked with many larger service providers, it is something that they wouldn't accept so why should we?

[Martin at NixonWilliams]

Just had a read through, decent article IMHO

It can be very confusing - I have experienced very different interpretations of MOO from employment contract specialists within the same firm before.

In my opinion future MOO is relatively simple and easy to perceive in most cases, present MOO is the tricky one..

[kevpuk]

Just had a read through, decent article IMHO