- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Bad debts and CT
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Bad debts and CT"
Collapse
-
Just done the 08/09 CT return (full of zeros) and that had things suggesting you could claim back losses from a previous year. But I know from experience HMRC have a fine first, provide information second approach so I'm wary of just ticking boxes because you inevitably only find out about the 10 other forms you were meant to submit when it's too late.Originally posted by SackmanandCo View PostYou can write off the oustanding amount as a bad debt.
Do I need to redo the accounts submitted to Companies House if I do this?
Leave a comment:
-
I would think that if the company isn't dormant you'll need to submit accounts and file tax returns for 08/09 and 09/10 anyway. If you get everything right, that should take care of it.
I would suggest looking at the corporation tax return forms (CT600) and seeing how daunting they are.
Leave a comment:
-
Bad debts and CT
This is for a Plan B co. that I started with somebody else as a 50/50 split a couple of years ago. In the first year (07/08) we invoiced about £7K, but only ever received about £2K. I've actually carried on doing the same thing, but the other guy didn't want to continue so I've been doing that through plan A co., but we kept the original company going in the hope that the money would turn up.
The client company is sort of still going in a very small way, and we did recently receive a small (£400) payment. But I think the chances of getting the money is small, and keeping going is not worth the hassle (and I think I've just got us a fine by forgetting to submit the accounts).
But the problem is we had to pay CT based on the ~£7K profit, about £1500. It'd obviously be nice to "write off" (if that's the right term) the nearly £~4.5K of that that we never received and get a refund on the tax.
Given the sums involved paying an accountant is not cost effective.
Any suggestions on how best to sort out the mess?
Ta.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Yesterday 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: