Read the exact wording of the restriction clause in your contract and check whether it refers to subsidiary's.
Also did you opt-in or out. If you opted in, the restriction clause is almost certainly void and the agency wouldn't even bother to squawk.
Finally, if it is a separate business, then would the agency know. They can be quite canny buggers at times (can't blame them - it is their business) and they usually find out if you have extended via the back door.
It it based at the same physical location?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Am I Tied In?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Am I Tied In?"
Collapse
-
Yes
or maybe
No.
It rather depends what it says in the contract you have with your agency. Suggest you read it
tl
Leave a comment:
-
Am I Tied In?
I've been contracting through an agency for a particular client (A) - this client is part-owned by a consultancy (B) and another company (C).
A has offered me an extension but I'd like to move on and I have been offered a role working directly for an off-shoot of the consultancy (D).
A, B, C and D are completely separate legal entities.
Can my current agency force me to work through them, or is the fact that A and D are not the same client free me from this restriction?
Thanks for any adviceTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Today 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Leave a comment: