Thanks for the replies. Shared liabilities are a good point - if a second line appears to be taking off, it could be hived off into a separate company.
As for the M&As, I think most are pretty non-restrictive "To carry on the business of a general commercial company" etc so that should be okay.
The main advantage from a tax point of view would be that I could offset expenses from one line against the income from contracting.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Using a LTD co for multiple lines of business"
Collapse
-
You'll need to leave the FLAT rate VAT scheme though if you are in it. Assuming the contracting will still make more money than the shop, otherwise you will lose a bundle paying IT FRR on your sale of supplies.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Torrango View PostWould it be problematic using a ltd "designed" as a contractor vehicle (e.g. via SJD, NW et al) for other lines of business? E.g. say I wanted to sell stuff on a website, employ somebody etc?
I guess the main reason to this is to keep overheads low for any "Plan B" ideas I might have by just using one Ltd co. Guess this might also be more likely to make the company seem legitimate rather than some ir35 dodge.
Increasing a number of the tax specialists in my area I chat to, say they are recommending clients use trading names, rather than separate Ltd Co's. With the rules to do with "associated companies" it actually makes more sense to put them under one Ltd co.
Its quite easy to do "consolidated" accounts, as long as the records are good.
Leave a comment:
-
- The entire assets of the buisness are at risk in the event of being sued etc. if they are not seperate entities
- The M+A must allow the activity (though most tend to say "and anything the directors feel like")
- Your accountants may wish to change their fee structure or may indeed decline to act for you, it's up to them the terms they do business on.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Torrango View PostWould it be problematic using a ltd "designed" as a contractor vehicle (e.g. via SJD, NW et al) for other lines of business? E.g. say I wanted to sell stuff on a website, employ somebody etc?
I guess the main reason to this is to keep overheads low for any "Plan B" ideas I might have by just using one ltd co. Guess this might also be more likely to make the company seem legitimate rather than some ir35 dodge.
The only time I'd avoid this arrangement is if you contract through your ltd co and also have another business, say a franchise. The franchise could get arsey if you 'hide' the contract income from them even though its nowt to do with them. Also, if you had to send your accounts to them once a year, they'd also be aware how much other income you had unless you had your accountant do 2 P&L reports.
Leave a comment:
-
Using a LTD co for multiple lines of business
Would it be problematic using a ltd "designed" as a contractor vehicle (e.g. via SJD, NW et al) for other lines of business? E.g. say I wanted to sell stuff on a website, employ somebody etc?
I guess the main reason to this is to keep overheads low for any "Plan B" ideas I might have by just using one ltd co. Guess this might also be more likely to make the company seem legitimate rather than some ir35 dodge.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Today 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Leave a comment: