Originally posted by BolshieBastard
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: P35 Q6 - again
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "P35 Q6 - again"
Collapse
-
If this is for your tax return, just dont ******* answer it!Originally posted by Ian View PostAn extract from the guidelines for part 1 is.......
The first question should be answered yes if:
• an individual performed services (intellectual, manual or a mixture of the two) for a client or clients, and
• the services were provided under a contract between the client and the company of which, at any time during the tax year, the individual performing the services was a shareholder, and
• the company’s income was, at any time during the tax year, derived wholly or mainly (that is, more than half of it) from the services performed by the shareholders personally.
What are peoples thoughts on giving/selling my shares, so the Misses owns 100% of the company, and for me to continue as an employee? Wouldn't that mean the bullets 2 & 3 can be answered as "No", and therefore part 1 is "No"?
The question would still need to be answered as Yes as it's for the year leading upto April '09 - but would it help for next year?
(OK, I know most of the answers will be YOU MUST BE MAD!
but what are peoples thoughts from a tax/IR35 point of view?)
Leave a comment:
-
P35 Q6 - again
An extract from the guidelines for part 1 is.......
The first question should be answered yes if:
• an individual performed services (intellectual, manual or a mixture of the two) for a client or clients, and
• the services were provided under a contract between the client and the company of which, at any time during the tax year, the individual performing the services was a shareholder, and
• the company’s income was, at any time during the tax year, derived wholly or mainly (that is, more than half of it) from the services performed by the shareholders personally.
What are peoples thoughts on giving/selling my shares, so the Misses owns 100% of the company, and for me to continue as an employee? Wouldn't that mean the bullets 2 & 3 can be answered as "No", and therefore part 1 is "No"?
The question would still need to be answered as Yes as it's for the year leading upto April '09 - but would it help for next year?
(OK, I know most of the answers will be YOU MUST BE MAD!
but what are peoples thoughts from a tax/IR35 point of view?)
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: