Originally posted by diesel
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Best way to deal with 'out of pocket' expenses?"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Just1morethen View PostThat's not what you said originally.
And even if he does take the extra £5 out on top its not extra money. Its got to come from somewhere.
There's a current thread discussing this issue. http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...nses-back.html
1. From client direct on client expense form (if he fills one in).
2. From his LTD as his expense.
Suppose all down to the individual and how he thinks the end client will feel when they sign of the expense sheet. But personally if its an allowable expense - claim it!
Leave a comment:
-
Yip. Fair point Oracle. But it all goes back (IMHO) to the Part & Parcel test that HMRC would apply in the event of an IR35 review. Being booked in under Client Co is very similar to how a permie would be treated and this along with other matters (see the email address thread in Contracts) is to be avoided.
Probably on their own it would be irrelevant but a combination of factors would allow HMRC to develop a case.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Just1morethen View PostThat's a good point Spacecadet. If you are genuinely in business on yuor own account it is unlikely that a client would pay your expenses direct. Better that you pay them and then get reimbursed.
e.g. Hilton Glasgow. Oracle rate £125 per night, room only. Client rate £75 a night, bed and breakfast. Client insisted on paying the bills, as they could do it cheaper than Oracle could.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Spacecadet View PostThis is considered bad practice for contractors operating outside IR35
I'm not sure whether it's actually been used in any case that HMRC have won on IR35 or not (or even if it's ever been mentioned).
Leave a comment:
-
That's a good point Spacecadet. If you are genuinely in business on yuor own account it is unlikely that a client would pay your expenses direct. Better that you pay them and then get reimbursed.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MugsGame View PostI stay in a hotel which they pay for directly,
Leave a comment:
-
That's not what you said originally.
And even if he does take the extra £5 out on top its not extra money. Its got to come from somewhere.
There's a current thread discussing this issue. http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...nses-back.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by diesel View Postthats if you claiming it from your LTD Co. Still £1.05 better in your pcoket than Mr HMRC.
But cant see why OP cant claim extra £5 out of pocket expenses on top of his meals to cover telephone calls, newspapers, drinks from coin machines etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Just1morethen View PostNo it doesn't. It reduces your taxable profit by £5 thus reducing your CT liability by £1.05.
But cant see why OP cant claim extra £5 out of pocket expenses on top of his meals to cover telephone calls, newspapers, drinks from coin machines etc.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by norrahe View Postaccording to my accountant i can claim £10 per day, for working away from home.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by diesel View Postcorrect me if i am wromg but sure you can claim up to £5 per night non-receiptable expenses from HMRC (and thsu your client and LTD co). Adds an extra £5 in your pocket just for the hassle of working away!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by diesel View Postcorrect me if i am wromg but sure you can claim up to £5 per night non-receiptable expenses from HMRC (and thsu your client and LTD co). Adds an extra £5 in your pocket just for the hassle of working away!
Leave a comment:
-
correct me if i am wromg but sure you can claim up to £5 per night non-receiptable expenses from HMRC (and thsu your client and LTD co). Adds an extra £5 in your pocket just for the hassle of working away!
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Today 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Yesterday 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
- Will HMRC’s 9% interest rate bully you into submission? Nov 5 09:10
Leave a comment: