Internal Phone Directory

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

TheFaQQer replied

21 October 2008, 18:47
Strictly speaking (and not being paranoid), I would think that if the directory is called "Employee Contact List", then being on it would be a minor pointer within IR35.

If the directory is called "Internal Directory" than I can't see it being a pointer one way or the other.

I wouldn't really worry about it - as already said, though, if you can get anything in there that refers to your external email, or company, then that would be better than not.
Leave a comment:
BolshieBastard replied

21 October 2008, 18:42
Originally posted by Just1morethen View Post

It would be deemed a pointer but probably not significant enough to merit too much concern. Provided you're covered for D&C, MOO, Substitution etc I wouldn't be too worried.

What rubbish! Being on a directory wouldnt be deemed a pointer. Some people are just raving paranoid.
Leave a comment:
Alan @ BroomeAffinity replied

21 October 2008, 15:29
It would be deemed a pointer but probably not significant enough to merit too much concern. Provided you're covered for D&C, MOO, Substitution etc I wouldn't be too worried.
Leave a comment:
Manic replied

21 October 2008, 15:24
Originally posted by Unicorn View Post

How about asking for it to look like

Manic (Your Co Name),
Ext - 666
Email - manic@yourco.co.uk

pretty clear you work for another co

Govt org, specification outside the norm not allowed!
Leave a comment:
Unicorn replied

21 October 2008, 14:52
Phone List

How about asking for it to look like

Manic (Your Co Name),
Ext - 666
Email - manic@yourco.co.uk

pretty clear you work for another co
Leave a comment:
Manic replied

21 October 2008, 14:28
Washing up, what's that?
Leave a comment:
QwertyBerty replied

21 October 2008, 14:26
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post

Irrelevant, I'd have thought - you could argue people need to get in touch with you in relation to the list of tasks you are contracted to deliver. One of my fellow contractors has got himself appointed fire warden which I thought was going a bit far.

What about being on the washing up rota?

QB.
Leave a comment:
Manic replied

21 October 2008, 14:25
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post

Irrelevant, I'd have thought - you could argue people need to get in touch with you in relation to the list of tasks you are contracted to deliver. One of my fellow contractors has got himself appointed fire warden which I thought was going a bit far.

Jeez, I think that is definitely over the mark.

Just wanted to check in case it pointed towards being part of the organisation.
Leave a comment:
Peoplesoft bloke replied

21 October 2008, 14:17
Originally posted by Manic View Post

Being on it, pointer to inside IR35 or not? Thoughts?

Irrelevant, I'd have thought - you could argue people need to get in touch with you in relation to the list of tasks you are contracted to deliver. One of my fellow contractors has got himself appointed fire warden which I thought was going a bit far.
Leave a comment:
Manic started a topic Internal Phone Directory

21 October 2008, 14:03
Internal Phone Directory

Being on it, pointer to inside IR35 or not? Thoughts?
Tags: None