• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Husband and wife company question"

Collapse

  • lambrini_socialist
    replied
    ok i think it's time to bite the bullet and set up an income shifting arrangement. can anyone point me to any advice for what i need to do in order to give (or sell?) some MyCo shares to my wife?

    cheers.....

    Leave a comment:


  • THEPUMA
    replied
    Originally posted by Bluebird View Post
    I've got a load of shares in BT - doesn't mean I do any work for them.
    The shares reflect my investment in monitary value in that company, if your co started with £100, and £50 came from the Mrs then she has a 50% share holding.
    The difference is that the BT share acquisition was a commercial arm's length transaction whereas you wouldn't have let anyone other than your wife acquire the shares in your company for £50.

    Shouldn't make any difference this tax year but it probably will when the new income shifting legislation is introduced next tax year.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Bluebird View Post
    I've got a load of shares in BT - doesn't mean I do any work for them.
    The shares reflect my investment in monitary value in that company, if your co started with £100, and £50 came from the Mrs then she has a 50% share holding.
    That's what I was going to say.

    A shareholder is someone who owns a share of the company, and they receive dividends from the company's profit.

    The normal way to pay someone for work that they do for the company is a salary.

    There is no connection between a shareholder and an employee.

    I'll be the major shareholder as certainly in the next couple of years I'll be bringing in money and she'll just be helping me in running the business. However without her skills the other business opportunities couldn't be pursued so she needs to be paid and given dividends.
    Why? I've never been given dividends by any company that I have worked for.

    Leave a comment:


  • London75
    replied
    Well, yes if only that were the way the government saw it!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bluebird
    replied
    I've got a load of shares in BT - doesn't mean I do any work for them.
    The shares reflect my investment in monitary value in that company, if your co started with £100, and £50 came from the Mrs then she has a 50% share holding.

    Leave a comment:


  • London75
    replied
    Because she'll be marketing and web site designing including the graphical work, I'm sure she'll easily be able to justify the salary, 3 years ago when she left work as a developer she was on 30k+ so only really needs to do 4-6 hours a week to justify it on those lines.

    I'm thinking I might as well go 50/50 as the intention is a family business that will grow and she'll be an equal part of it.

    I'll read up on s660 but I'm hoping as she will actually be a working partner albeit less so in the first couple of years that we're legitimately using the company structure.

    Cheers, Andy

    Leave a comment:


  • Zen Contracting
    replied
    As things stand at the moment there is no problem with what you advocate. However, you should be careful about paying your wife a salary that reflects the amount of work she truly does for the company e.g. if she does an hour or two a week of bookkeeping and gets say £5,435 a year for it then HMRC might try to invoke s660. A good approach to managing this might be to get your wife to keep detailed time sheets showing what she does and the hours spent working.

    David.

    Leave a comment:


  • moorfield
    replied
    Originally posted by London75 View Post

    Is a 7:3 split of 10 shares suitable or is anything other than 100% shares for me a big flag saying "investigate me?" This is the level at which I see her input, commitment and risk.
    WHS above. Do a Tarrant and go 50/50 with the missus. Be a dirty income shifter while you can.

    Leave a comment:


  • London75
    replied
    Thanks, just want to be reasonable and fair in setting things up but not get investigated for a stupid error.

    Quite right, my wife isn't working so it's a shame to waste that lovely tax allowance and get her working!

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis
    replied
    Originally posted by London75 View Post
    I'm just setting up a Ltd after careful trawling of these forums and other sites but now have a quick question about making my wife a shareholder.

    There is the complete intention that she'll work for the company but until I get on my feet and sorted and settled in my current contract I'm not going to have time to bring in the business.

    I'd obviously like to make her a shareholder for tax reasons and she'll be doing all the admin and get started on the marketing and websites for other aspects I plan for the business.

    Do HMRC need to see some sense in the split of shares? I'll be the major shareholder as certainly in the next couple of years I'll be bringing in money and she'll just be helping me in running the business. However without her skills the other business opportunities couldn't be pursued so she needs to be paid and given dividends.

    Is a 7:3 split of 10 shares suitable or is anything other than 100% shares for me a big flag saying "investigate me?" This is the level at which I see her input, commitment and risk.

    Cheers, Andy
    I assume she does not work, otherwise there is less of a tax advantage. You can go 50/50 without any worries at the moment. Things may change after the next budget, it all depends upon the Income Shifting MkII legislation. You may then have to transfer shares. No point trying to pre-empt what the legislation will be, so do whatever suits you best for now.

    Leave a comment:


  • cykophysh39
    replied
    Oh Yeah I think you have just described exactly the case that most contractors do.

    Leave a comment:


  • London75
    started a topic Husband and wife company question

    Husband and wife company question

    I'm just setting up a Ltd after careful trawling of these forums and other sites but now have a quick question about making my wife a shareholder.

    There is the complete intention that she'll work for the company but until I get on my feet and sorted and settled in my current contract I'm not going to have time to bring in the business.

    I'd obviously like to make her a shareholder for tax reasons and she'll be doing all the admin and get started on the marketing and websites for other aspects I plan for the business.

    Do HMRC need to see some sense in the split of shares? I'll be the major shareholder as certainly in the next couple of years I'll be bringing in money and she'll just be helping me in running the business. However without her skills the other business opportunities couldn't be pursued so she needs to be paid and given dividends.

    Is a 7:3 split of 10 shares suitable or is anything other than 100% shares for me a big flag saying "investigate me?" This is the level at which I see her input, commitment and risk.

    Cheers, Andy

Working...
X