• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "How would this one stand up then?"

Collapse

  • Rebecca Loos
    replied
    if he is a Kiwi, then I am sure he would have been able to register his residency and domicile status appropriately for the scheme to work

    Leave a comment:


  • up4it
    replied
    so the illegal immigrants are all IT workers coming back here to work on the quiet!! ;-))

    Leave a comment:


  • insight14
    replied
    There must have been more to the scheme than I've represented I'm sure. He is a Kiwi (dodgy kiwis!), which may have helped in disproving being UK domocile. Not sure how they explained this away though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rebecca Loos
    replied
    ASB is right, however there is a possibility that you are not UK Resident, or ordinarily resident or UK domiciled. Complex rules govern anyone's status as to residency, ordinary residency and domicile, and this affects the tax status of any income earned outside the UK.
    So it is possible (although under specific circumstances only) that your world wide income is not taxable in the UK. But it would be hard if you are a UK citizen, have always lived in this country and own a house here.

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    ho hum

    Originally posted by insight14
    Obviously dodgy, but difficult for the IR to prove otherwise?
    Still UK resident, liable for tax on worldwide income. IR don't need to prove anything. Friend needs to disprove (if investigated of course). 100% penalties would be a likely result. And maybe jail time.

    From the payer there is also the possibility of false accounting as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • privateeye
    replied
    Not 100% sure on this one, but I think you are required to be out of the country for a certain period of time otherwise the IR are entitled to charge you UK tax minus local tax but no rebate if it works out that way. I think you are only allowed in the UK for approx 90 days per tax year to get the benefits of local tax.

    The IR created a fuss with me a few years ago when the Swiss gave me a very low tax rate. I was only there 4 months but moved on to another country. The IR were trying to get back the tax I saved in Switzerland but I escaped this as the next contract was still outside of the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • insight14
    replied
    Entirely possible yes... He is certainly not averse to risk-taking!

    Leave a comment:


  • insight14
    started a topic How would this one stand up then?

    How would this one stand up then?

    A few years ago a friend was using a very creative umbrella company - haven't seen him in a while, so don't know if they are still around.

    Basically, they would pay you whatever portion of your income you wanted in the UK (say 30% - enough for you to live on), on which you pay NI, PAYE etc. Then, when you went on holidays (for a period over 7 days), you were said to have been "consulting" for your extra 70% to a Singaporean firm in Singapore and thus liable to pay Singapore tax (which was only 10%).

    Obviously dodgy, but difficult for the IR to prove otherwise?

Working...
X