Originally posted by a7awo
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "ROS has been confirmed as mirrored - anything else to consider?"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by gadgetman View PostI've managed to get my agency to confirm that the ROS clause is indeed mirrored in the upper contract as of course are the general payment, notice period clauses etc. They are actually sending me an extract from the contract.
Is this the main point to be concerned about or are there any other specifics I should get them to confirm?
When you get the extract, make sure that the right of substitution actually does rest with your company rather than the agency. What you sometimes find is that upper level contracts are essentially agreements for an agency to provide individuals with no mention of the contractor's company. The 'right of substitution' often just says that the agency will send another temporary worker.
Leave a comment:
-
ROS has been confirmed as mirrored - anything else to consider?
I've managed to get my agency to confirm that the ROS clause is indeed mirrored in the upper contract as of course are the general payment, notice period clauses etc. They are actually sending me an extract from the contract.
Is this the main point to be concerned about or are there any other specifics I should get them to confirm?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Yesterday 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Yesterday 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
Leave a comment: